Suppr超能文献

金融不确定性与利率变动:亚洲债券市场的波动性是否不同?

Financial uncertainty and interest rate movements: is Asian bond market volatility different?

作者信息

Kim Jungsuk, Kumar Abhishek, Mallick Sushanta, Park Donghyun

机构信息

Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea.

Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Ann Oper Res. 2021 Nov 1:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04314-7.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to a spike in financial market volatility. In this paper, we attempt to assess the effects of financial & news-driven uncertainty shocks in growing Asian economies, using country-specific bond volatility shocks as a measure of local interest rate uncertainty. Also, we contrast the effects of local uncertainty with global stock market uncertainty. Using bond market data from nine Asian markets, we uncover a transmission mechanism of uncertainty shocks via the bond market. The mechanism works as a crowding-out effect due to government-led excessive market borrowing with supply-side consequences for the private sector, as opposed to economic policy or global stock market uncertainty which works more like a demand shock as in the literature. We conclude that countries with growing fiscal deficits that entail a larger government bond market or higher current account deficits, tend to experience an increase in the cost of borrowing due to this bond market volatility or interest rate uncertainty shocks.

摘要

新冠疫情导致金融市场波动性激增。在本文中,我们试图评估金融和新闻驱动的不确定性冲击对亚洲增长型经济体的影响,使用特定国家的债券波动性冲击作为当地利率不确定性的衡量指标。此外,我们还对比了本地不确定性与全球股票市场不确定性的影响。利用来自九个亚洲市场的债券市场数据,我们揭示了不确定性冲击通过债券市场的传导机制。该机制表现为一种挤出效应,这是由于政府主导的过度市场借款对私营部门产生了供应端影响,这与经济政策或全球股票市场不确定性不同,后者在文献中更像是一种需求冲击。我们得出结论,财政赤字不断增加、政府债券市场规模较大或经常账户赤字较高的国家,往往会因这种债券市场波动或利率不确定性冲击而面临借款成本上升的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbe3/8558767/32c3bd207900/10479_2021_4314_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验