Bauer Annette, Best Stephanie, Malley Juliette, Christiansen Hanna, Goodyear Melinda, Zechmeister-Koss Ingrid, Paul Jean
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NWS, Australia.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 22;12:741225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.741225. eCollection 2021.
In several high-income countries, family-focused practice programs have been introduced in adult mental health care settings to identify and support children whose parents live with mental health problems. Whilst their common goal is to reduce the impact of parental mental illness on children, the mechanisms by which they improve outcomes in different systems and settings are less well known. This kind of knowledge can importantly contribute to ensuring that practice programs achieve pre-defined impacts. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge about relationships between contextual factors, mechanisms and impact that could inform a program theory for developing, implementing, and evaluating family-focused practice. Principles of a realist evaluation approach and complex system thinking were used to conceptualize the design of semi-structured in-depth interviews with individuals who led the implementation of programs. Seventeen individuals from eight countries participated in the study. Interviewees provided rich accounts of the components that programs should include, contextual factors in which they operated, as well as the behavior changes in practitioners that programs needed to achieve. Together with information from the literature, we developed an initial program theory, which illustrates the interconnectedness between changes that need to co-occur in practitioners, parents, and children, many of which related to a more open communication about parental mental health problems. Stigma, risk-focused and fragmented health systems, and a lack of management commitment were the root causes explaining, for example, why conversations about parents' mental illness did not take place, or not in a way that they could help children. Enabling practitioners to focus on parents' strengths was assumed to trigger changes in knowledge, emotions and behaviors in parents that would subsequently benefit children, by reducing feelings of guilt and improving self-esteem. To our knowledge, this is the first research, which synthesizes knowledge about how family-focused practice programs works in a way that it can inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs. Stakeholder, who fund, design, implement or evaluate programs should start co-developing and using program theories like the one presented in this paper to strengthen the design and delivery of family-focused practice.
在几个高收入国家,成人心理健康护理机构引入了以家庭为中心的实践项目,以识别并支持父母患有心理健康问题的儿童。虽然这些项目的共同目标是减轻父母精神疾病对孩子的影响,但它们在不同系统和环境中改善结果的机制却鲜为人知。这类知识对于确保实践项目实现预定影响至关重要。本研究的目的是深入了解背景因素、机制和影响之间的关系,从而为制定、实施和评估以家庭为中心的实践提供理论依据。我们运用现实主义评价方法和复杂系统思维的原则,对负责项目实施的人员进行半结构化深度访谈的设计进行概念化。来自八个国家的17人参与了这项研究。受访者详细描述了项目应包含的组成部分、项目实施的背景因素,以及项目所需促成的从业者行为变化。结合文献资料,我们构建了一个初步的项目理论,该理论阐明了从业者、父母和孩子身上需要同时发生的变化之间的相互联系,其中许多变化与更开放地交流父母的心理健康问题有关。例如,耻辱感、以风险为导向且分散的卫生系统以及缺乏管理承诺是导致关于父母精神疾病的对话无法进行或无法以有助于孩子的方式进行的根本原因。使从业者关注父母的优势被认为会引发父母在知识、情感和行为方面的变化,进而通过减少内疚感和提高自尊来使孩子受益。据我们所知,这是第一项综合研究家庭聚焦实践项目如何发挥作用的研究,其研究方式可为项目的设计、实施和评估提供参考。资助、设计、实施或评估项目的利益相关者应开始共同开发并运用本文提出的这类项目理论,以加强以家庭为中心的实践的设计与实施。