College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Southgate Institute for Health Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):510-521. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.121.
The importance of evaluating policy processes to achieve health equity is well recognised but such evaluation encounters methodological, theoretical and political challenges. This paper describes how a program theorybased evaluation framework can be developed and tested, using the example of an evaluation of the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative.
A framework of the theorised components and relationships of the HiAP initiative was produced to guide evaluation. The framework was the product of a collaborative, iterative process underpinned by a policy-research partnership and drew on social and political science theory and relevant policy literature.
The process engaged key stakeholders to capture both HiAP specific and broader bureaucratic knowledge and was informed by a number of social and political science theories. The framework provides a basis for exploring the interactions between framework components and how they shape policy-making and public policy. It also enables an assessment of HiAP's success in integrating health and equity considerations in policies, thereby laying a foundation for predicting the impacts of resulting policies.
The use of a program theory-based evaluation framework developed through a consultative process and informed by social and political science theory has accommodated the complexity of public policy-making. The framework allows for examination of HiAP processes and impacts, and for the tracking of contribution towards distal outcomes through the explicit articulation of the underpinning program theory.
评估政策过程以实现健康公平的重要性已得到广泛认可,但此类评估面临着方法、理论和政治方面的挑战。本文以评估南澳大利亚州全政策健康倡议(HiAP)为例,介绍如何制定和测试基于理论的评估框架。
为指导评估,制作了一个包含 HiAP 倡议理论化组成部分和关系的框架。该框架是合作、迭代过程的产物,以政策研究伙伴关系为基础,并借鉴了社会和政治学理论及相关政策文献。
该过程使主要利益相关者参与其中,既获取了 HiAP 特定知识,也获取了更广泛的官僚主义知识,并受到了一些社会和政治学理论的影响。该框架为探索框架组成部分之间的相互作用以及它们如何塑造决策和公共政策提供了基础。它还能够评估 HiAP 在将健康和公平因素纳入政策方面的成功程度,从而为预测相关政策的影响奠定基础。
通过协商过程制定并以社会和政治学理论为依据的基于理论的评估框架,适应了公共政策制定的复杂性。该框架允许对 HiAP 进行过程和影响的检查,并通过明确阐述基础方案理论,跟踪对远端结果的贡献。