• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are Personality-Based Intellectual Styles Culture Specific or Universal?基于个性的智力风格是特定于文化还是具有普遍性?
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:717670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717670. eCollection 2021.
2
Beyond person-environment congruence: Career adaptability, career personality styles, and thinking styles.超越人与环境的一致性:职业适应性、职业人格风格和思维风格。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104308. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104308. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Mental health and thinking styles in Sternberg's theory: an exploratory study.斯滕伯格理论中的心理健康与思维方式:一项探索性研究。
Psychol Rep. 2010 Dec;107(3):784-94. doi: 10.2466/02.04.09.PR0.107.6.784-794.
4
Thinking styles and cognitive development.思维方式与认知发展。
J Genet Psychol. 2002 Jun;163(2):179-95. doi: 10.1080/00221320209598676.
5
Current Perspectives in the Study of Personality Across Cultures.跨文化人格研究的现状。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;5(4):441-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375559.
6
Cultural influences on personality.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:133-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200.
7
Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: an investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R.与人格特质相关的思维方式:思维方式量表与大五人格量表的调查研究
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Sep;45(4):293-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00408.x.
8
Are Surgeons Born or Made? A Comparison of Personality Traits and Learning Styles Between Surgical Trainees and Medical Students.外科医生是天生的还是后天培养的?外科实习生与医学生人格特质和学习方式的比较。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Sep-Oct;73(5):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
The Relationship Between Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions, Schwartz's Cultural Values, and Obesity.霍夫斯泰德文化维度、施瓦茨文化价值观与肥胖之间的关系
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):968-987. doi: 10.1177/0033294118777965. Epub 2018 May 22.
10
Personality traits across cultures.跨文化的人格特质
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
In-Depth Relationships between Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits in Meditation Practitioners.冥想练习者中情商与人格特质的深入关系。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018 Nov 30;16(4):391-397. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.4.391.
2
Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects.美国的职业兴趣:性别、年龄、种族和年份效应。
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Oct;63(5):604-615. doi: 10.1037/cou0000164. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Identity development, intelligence structure, and interests: a cross-sectional study in a group of Italian adolescents during the decision-making process.身份认同发展、智力结构与兴趣:一项针对意大利青少年群体在决策过程中的横断面研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2015 Aug 20;8:239-49. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S88631. eCollection 2015.
4
The structure of vocational interests in Romania.罗马尼亚的职业兴趣结构。
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Apr;60(2):294-302. doi: 10.1037/a0032199. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
5
Personality: the universal and the culturally specific.个性:普遍的与文化特定的。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:369-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655.
6
Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior.作为对特定文化行为的解释,偏好与策略。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):579-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x.
7
Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know?心理共性:它们是什么以及我们如何知晓?
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):763-84. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.763.
8
Ego development and individual differences in personality.自我发展与人格的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Oct;65(4):792-800. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.792.

基于个性的智力风格是特定于文化还是具有普遍性?

Are Personality-Based Intellectual Styles Culture Specific or Universal?

作者信息

Zhang Li-Fang

机构信息

Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:717670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717670. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717670
PMID:34744878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8564360/
Abstract

Traditionally, it had been commonly believed that individuals in the same culture have personalities distinct from those of individuals in other cultures. This article examines this belief by critically reviewing relevant literature generated from two of the most widely investigated personality-based style constructs in the field of intellectual styles: the Jungian personality styles and the career personality styles proposed by Holland. It aims at answering the question of whether personality-based intellectual styles are culture specific or they are universal. To achieve this aim, based on the two broad cultural systems derived from Hofstede's model of four cultural dimensions and two major style types from Zhang and Sternberg's threefold model of intellectual styles, two research hypotheses were made. To test the hypotheses, two types of empirical literature centered on each of the two personality-based styles are reviewed: (1) cross-cultural comparative studies; and (2) within-culture studies investigating the association of the two style constructs with other human attributes and outcomes. Results suggest that although personality-based styles are related to culture, they cannot be culture specific; rather, they are fundamentally universal. These findings carry scientific value and have practical implications for education and beyond.

摘要

传统上,人们普遍认为同一文化中的个体具有与其他文化中的个体不同的个性。本文通过批判性地回顾智力风格领域中两个研究最为广泛的基于个性的风格结构所产生的相关文献,来审视这一观点:荣格个性风格和霍兰德提出的职业个性风格。其目的是回答基于个性的智力风格是特定于文化的还是普遍存在的这一问题。为实现这一目标,基于霍夫斯泰德四个文化维度模型衍生出的两种广泛文化系统以及张和斯滕伯格智力风格三重模型中的两种主要风格类型,提出了两个研究假设。为检验这些假设,回顾了以两种基于个性的风格中的每一种为中心的两类实证文献:(1)跨文化比较研究;(2)调查两种风格结构与其他人类属性及结果之间关联的文化内部研究。结果表明,尽管基于个性的风格与文化有关,但它们并非特定于文化;相反,它们从根本上说是普遍的。这些发现具有科学价值,并对教育及其他领域具有实际意义。