Zhang Li-Fang
Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:717670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717670. eCollection 2021.
Traditionally, it had been commonly believed that individuals in the same culture have personalities distinct from those of individuals in other cultures. This article examines this belief by critically reviewing relevant literature generated from two of the most widely investigated personality-based style constructs in the field of intellectual styles: the Jungian personality styles and the career personality styles proposed by Holland. It aims at answering the question of whether personality-based intellectual styles are culture specific or they are universal. To achieve this aim, based on the two broad cultural systems derived from Hofstede's model of four cultural dimensions and two major style types from Zhang and Sternberg's threefold model of intellectual styles, two research hypotheses were made. To test the hypotheses, two types of empirical literature centered on each of the two personality-based styles are reviewed: (1) cross-cultural comparative studies; and (2) within-culture studies investigating the association of the two style constructs with other human attributes and outcomes. Results suggest that although personality-based styles are related to culture, they cannot be culture specific; rather, they are fundamentally universal. These findings carry scientific value and have practical implications for education and beyond.
传统上,人们普遍认为同一文化中的个体具有与其他文化中的个体不同的个性。本文通过批判性地回顾智力风格领域中两个研究最为广泛的基于个性的风格结构所产生的相关文献,来审视这一观点:荣格个性风格和霍兰德提出的职业个性风格。其目的是回答基于个性的智力风格是特定于文化的还是普遍存在的这一问题。为实现这一目标,基于霍夫斯泰德四个文化维度模型衍生出的两种广泛文化系统以及张和斯滕伯格智力风格三重模型中的两种主要风格类型,提出了两个研究假设。为检验这些假设,回顾了以两种基于个性的风格中的每一种为中心的两类实证文献:(1)跨文化比较研究;(2)调查两种风格结构与其他人类属性及结果之间关联的文化内部研究。结果表明,尽管基于个性的风格与文化有关,但它们并非特定于文化;相反,它们从根本上说是普遍的。这些发现具有科学价值,并对教育及其他领域具有实际意义。