Koenen Mischa H, Bosma Madeleen, Roorda Udo A, Wopereis Fabiënne My, Roos Anja, van der Vries Erhard, Bogaert Debby, Sanders Elisabeth Am, Boes Marianne, Heidema Jojanneke, van Montfrans Joris M, Balemans Walter Af, van Holten Thijs C, Verhagen Lilly M
Center of Translational Immunology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Chemistry St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands.
Clin Transl Immunology. 2021 Oct 29;10(11):e1344. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1344. eCollection 2021.
While physicians are often confronted with immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency in children with recurrent infections, the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear. Large-scale studies examining the significance of IgA deficiency in children are hampered by differences in techniques for measuring IgA and the physiological increase of IgA with age. Both result in a variety of reference values used for diagnosing IgA deficiency. We propose a new laboratory-independent method to accurately compare IgA measurements in children of varying ages.
We present a method to standardise IgA values for age and laboratory differences. We applied this method to a multicentre case-control study of children under the age of seven suffering from recurrent respiratory tract infections (rRTI, cases) and children who had IgA measured as part of coeliac disease screening (controls). We defined IgA deficiency as serum IgA measurements < 2.5% for age-specific reference values.
We developed reference values for IgA for seven age groups and five different laboratory assays. Using these reference values, IgA measurements from 417 cases and 224 controls were standardised to compare groups. In children aged 2 years and older, IgA deficiency was observed in 2.9% (7/242) of cases and 0% (0/189) of controls ( = 0.02).
We present a method to compare IgA values in cohorts that vary in age and laboratory assay. This way, we showed that IgA deficiency was more prevalent in children with rRTI compared with controls. This implicates that IgA deficiency may be a clinically relevant condition, even in young children.
虽然医生在患有反复感染的儿童中经常遇到免疫球蛋白A(IgA)缺乏的情况,但这一发现的临床相关性尚不清楚。由于测量IgA的技术差异以及IgA随年龄的生理性增加,大规模研究儿童IgA缺乏的意义受到阻碍。这两者都导致了用于诊断IgA缺乏的各种参考值。我们提出了一种新的与实验室无关的方法,以准确比较不同年龄儿童的IgA测量值。
我们提出了一种针对年龄和实验室差异对IgA值进行标准化的方法。我们将此方法应用于一项多中心病例对照研究,该研究对象为7岁以下患有反复呼吸道感染的儿童(rRTI,病例组)和作为乳糜泻筛查一部分进行IgA测量的儿童(对照组)。我们将IgA缺乏定义为血清IgA测量值低于年龄特异性参考值的2.5%。
我们制定了七个年龄组和五种不同实验室检测方法的IgA参考值。使用这些参考值,对417例病例和224例对照的IgA测量值进行标准化以比较各组。在2岁及以上的儿童中,病例组中2.9%(7/242)的儿童存在IgA缺乏,对照组中为0%(0/189)(P = 0.02)。
我们提出了一种比较年龄和实验室检测方法不同的队列中IgA值的方法。通过这种方式,我们表明与对照组相比,rRTI儿童中IgA缺乏更为普遍。这意味着即使在幼儿中,IgA缺乏也可能是一种具有临床相关性的情况。