Metwalli Ohoud, Hashem Enayat, Ajabnoor Mohammed Ali, Alama Nabil, Banjar Zainy M
Pathology, Department of Laboratory, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Clinical Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 3;13(10):e18450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18450. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Background and aim of the study The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in the inflammatory mediator's serum amyloid A (SAA), adiponectin, and resistin in the serum of patients with stable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Subjects and methods The study was done on 60 subjects divided into three groups: 20 healthy normal individuals as a control group, 20 patients with stable angina (atherosclerotic plaque), and 20 patients with myocardial infarction. Fasting blood samples were withdrawn from all subjects and serum was prepared. SAA, resistin, and adiponectin levels were quantitatively measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results The SAA level was significantly higher in both stable angina and the acute myocardial infarction group than the control group (2.7179 ± 0.44501 mg/L) and the serum resistin level was significantly higher (p-value = 0.0) in the stable angina (8.368 ± 1.633 ng/ml) and the acute myocardial infarction (13.606 ± 2.067 ng/ml) groups (p-value= 0.0) than the control group. (2.4272±1.25210 ng/ml). Moreover, resistin levels in stable angina when compared to the AMI showed a significant difference between them (p-value = 0.0) while adiponectin was significantly lower in the acute myocardial infarction group. (6.641±2.6011 µg/mL, p-value = 0.019) than its level in the control group (11.873±1.798 µg/mL). While the adiponectin level showed no significant differences between stable angina in comparison to the AMI. Conclusion SAA can be used as a confirmatory marker for stable angina and a diagnostic tool for AMI patients. Both SAA and resistin may participate in the atherosclerosis process as an effectors molecule of inflammatory reactions. For adiponectin, we concluded that it has the antiatherogenic property and its levels were lower in both the stable angina and acute myocardial infarction groups.
研究背景与目的 本研究旨在评估稳定型心绞痛和急性心肌梗死患者血清中炎症介质血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)、脂联素和抵抗素的变化。
对象与方法 本研究对60名受试者进行,分为三组:20名健康正常个体作为对照组,20名稳定型心绞痛(动脉粥样硬化斑块)患者,以及20名心肌梗死患者。从所有受试者中采集空腹血样并制备血清。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法定量测定SAA、抵抗素和脂联素水平。
结果 稳定型心绞痛组和急性心肌梗死组的SAA水平均显著高于对照组(2.7179±0.44501mg/L),稳定型心绞痛组(8.368±1.633ng/ml)和急性心肌梗死组(13.606±2.067ng/ml)的血清抵抗素水平显著高于对照组(2.4272±1.25210ng/ml)(p值=0.0)。此外,稳定型心绞痛组与急性心肌梗死组相比,抵抗素水平存在显著差异(p值=0.0),而急性心肌梗死组的脂联素水平显著低于对照组(6.641±2.6011μg/mL,p值=0.019)(11.873±1.798μg/mL)。而稳定型心绞痛组与急性心肌梗死组相比,脂联素水平无显著差异。
结论 SAA可作为稳定型心绞痛的确证标志物及急性心肌梗死患者的诊断工具。SAA和抵抗素均可能作为炎症反应的效应分子参与动脉粥样硬化过程。对于脂联素,我们得出结论,它具有抗动脉粥样硬化特性,且在稳定型心绞痛组和急性心肌梗死组中水平均较低。