• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Value-of-Information Framework for Personalizing the Timing of Surveillance Testing.用于个性化监测测试时间的信息价值框架。
Med Decis Making. 2022 May;42(4):474-486. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211049213. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
2
When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.多少证据才算足够?——运用系统决策分析和信息价值分析来确定是否需要更多证据。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(9-10):575-84. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
A value of information framework for assessing the trade-offs associated with uncertainty, duration, and cost of chemical toxicity testing.一种用于评估化学毒性测试的不确定性、持续时间和成本相关权衡的信息价值框架。
Risk Anal. 2023 Mar;43(3):498-515. doi: 10.1111/risa.13931. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
9
A MEA is a MEA is a MEA? Sequential decision making and the impact of different managed entry agreements at the manufacturer and payer level, using a case study for an oncology drug in England.医疗设备评估即医疗设备评估即医疗设备评估?使用英国一种肿瘤药物的案例研究,探讨制造商和支付方层面连续决策与不同管理准入协议的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Feb;22(1):51-73. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01228-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Making Drug Approval Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty: Cumulative Evidence versus Value of Information.面对不确定性制定药物审批决策:累积证据与信息价值。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):512-528. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241255047. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Early Biomarker Change and Treatment Adherence to Predict Risk of Relapse Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are in Remission.利用早期生物标志物变化和治疗依从性预测慢性髓性白血病缓解期患者的复发风险。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jul;9:e2500003. doi: 10.1200/CCI-25-00003. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Reinforcement learning for individualized lung cancer screening schedules: A nested case-control study.强化学习在个体化肺癌筛查计划中的应用:一项嵌套病例对照研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7436. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7436.

本文引用的文献

1
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - .美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法的共识声明 -
Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139. doi: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472.
2
A Value of Information Analysis of Research on the 21-Gene Assay for Breast Cancer Management.基于信息价值的乳腺癌管理 21 基因检测研究分析。
Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1102-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
An application of restricted mean survival time in a competing risks setting: comparing time to ART initiation by injection drug use.受限平均生存时间在竞争风险环境下的应用:比较注射吸毒者开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的时间。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0484-z.
4
Cystic fibrosis physicians' perspectives on the timing of referral for lung transplant evaluation: a survey of physicians in the United States.囊性纤维化医生对肺移植评估转诊时机的看法:美国医生的一项调查
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0367-9.
5
Survival Benefit of Lung Transplantation in the Modern Era of Lung Allocation.现代肺分配时代肺移植的生存获益
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):172-181. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-507OC.
6
Patient factors associated with lung transplant referral and waitlist for patients with cystic fibrosis and pulmonary fibrosis.与囊性纤维化和肺纤维化患者的肺移植转诊及等待名单相关的患者因素。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Mar;36(3):264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
7
Categorization of Cancer Survivors: Why We Need It.癌症幸存者的分类:我们为何需要它。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3372-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3870. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options.关于具有事件发生时间结局的纵向预测:建模选项的比较。
Biometrics. 2017 Mar;73(1):83-93. doi: 10.1111/biom.12562. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Design and Methods of a National Observational Disease Registry.囊性纤维化基金会患者登记处。一个国家观察性疾病登记处的设计与方法。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jul;13(7):1173-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-781OC.
10
Predictors of non-referral of patients with cystic fibrosis for lung transplant evaluation in the United States.美国囊性纤维化患者未被转诊进行肺移植评估的预测因素。
J Cyst Fibros. 2016 Mar;15(2):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

用于个性化监测测试时间的信息价值框架。

A Value-of-Information Framework for Personalizing the Timing of Surveillance Testing.

机构信息

The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2022 May;42(4):474-486. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211049213. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X211049213
PMID:34747265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9007840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient surveillance using repeated biomarker measurements presents an opportunity to detect and treat disease progression early. Frequent surveillance testing using biomarkers is recommended and routinely conducted in several diseases, including cancer and diabetes. However, frequent testing involves tradeoffs. Although surveillance tests provide information about current disease status, the complications and costs of frequent tests may not be justified for patients who are at low risk of progression. Predictions based on patients' earlier biomarker values may be used to inform decision making; however, predictions are uncertain, leading to decision uncertainty.

METHODS

We propose the Personalized Risk-Adaptive Surveillance (PRAISE) framework, a novel method for embedding predictions into a value-of-information (VOI) framework to account for the cost of uncertainty over time and determine the time point at which collection of biomarker data would be most valuable. The proposed sequential decision-making framework is innovative in that it leverages the patient's longitudinal history, considers individual benefits and harms, and allows for dynamic tailoring of surveillance intervals by considering the uncertainty in current information and estimating the probability that new information may change treatment decisions, as well as the impact of this change on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

When applied to data from cystic fibrosis patients, PRAISE lowers costs by allowing some patients to skip a visit, compared to an "always test" strategy. It does so without compromising expected survival, by recommending less frequent testing among those who are unlikely to be treated at the skipped time point.

CONCLUSIONS

A VOI-based approach to patient monitoring is feasible and could be applied to several diseases to develop more cost-effective and personalized strategies for ongoing patient care.

HIGHLIGHTS

In many patient-monitoring settings, the complications and costs of frequent tests are not justified for patients who are at low risk of disease progression. Predictions based on patient history may be used to individualize the timing of patient visits based on evolving risk.We propose Personalized Risk-Adaptive Surveillance (PRAISE), a novel method for personalizing the timing of surveillance testing, where prediction modeling projects the disease trajectory and a value-of-information (VOI)-based pragmatic decision-theoretic framework quantifies patient- and time-specific benefit-harm tradeoffs.A VOI-based approach to patient monitoring could be applied to several diseases to develop more personalized and cost-effective strategies for ongoing patient care.

摘要

背景

利用重复的生物标志物测量进行患者监测为早期发现和治疗疾病进展提供了机会。在包括癌症和糖尿病在内的几种疾病中,建议并常规进行频繁的生物标志物监测测试。然而,频繁的测试存在权衡。尽管监测测试提供了关于当前疾病状况的信息,但对于进展风险较低的患者,频繁测试的并发症和成本可能不合理。基于患者早期生物标志物值的预测可用于辅助决策;然而,预测具有不确定性,导致决策不确定性。

方法

我们提出了个性化风险自适应监测(PRAISE)框架,这是一种将预测纳入信息价值(VOI)框架的新方法,以随时间考虑不确定性的成本,并确定收集生物标志物数据最有价值的时间点。所提出的序贯决策框架具有创新性,它利用了患者的纵向病史,考虑了个体的收益和危害,并允许通过考虑当前信息的不确定性和估计新信息可能改变治疗决策的概率,以及这种变化对患者结果的影响,来动态调整监测间隔。

结果

当应用于囊性纤维化患者的数据时,与“始终测试”策略相比,PRAISE 通过允许一些患者跳过就诊,可以降低成本。它通过在不太可能在跳过时间点接受治疗的患者中推荐更不频繁的测试,在不影响预期生存的情况下做到了这一点。

结论

基于 VOI 的患者监测方法是可行的,可以应用于多种疾病,以制定更具成本效益和个性化的持续患者护理策略。

重点

在许多患者监测环境中,对于进展风险较低的患者,频繁测试的并发症和成本可能不合理。基于患者病史的预测可以用于根据不断变化的风险来个性化患者就诊的时间。我们提出了个性化风险自适应监测(PRAISE),这是一种个性化监测测试时间的新方法,其中预测模型预测疾病轨迹,基于信息价值(VOI)的实用决策理论框架量化了患者和时间特定的收益-危害权衡。基于 VOI 的患者监测方法可以应用于多种疾病,以制定更具个性化和成本效益的持续患者护理策略。