Liu Yuan, Vela Monica, Rudakevych Tanya, Wigfield Christopher, Garrity Edward, Saunders Milda R
Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Mar;36(3):264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
Since 2005, the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) has prioritized patient benefit and post-transplant survival, reducing waitlist to transplant time to <200 days and decreasing mortality on the waitlist. A current challenge is the wait for the waitlist-the time between the patient's transplant-eligible diagnosis and waitlist registration.
We investigated whether sociodemographic (age, sex, race, insurance, marital status, median household income) and clinical (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV] percent of predicted, body mass index, depression/anxiety, alcohol/substance misuse, absolute/relative contraindications) factors influenced referral and waitlist registration. We conducted a retrospective cohort study through chart review of hospitalized patients on the University of Chicago general medicine service from 2006 to 2014 who met transplant-eligible criteria and ICD-9 billing codes for cystic fibrosis (CF) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). We analyzed the times from transplant eligibility to referral, work-up and waitlisting using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.
Overall, the referral rate for transplant-eligible patients was 64%. Of those referred, approximately 36% reach the lung transplant waitlist. Referred CF patients were significantly more likely to reach the transplant waitlist than PF patients (CF 60% vs PF 22%, p < 0.05). In addition, CF patients had a shorter wait from transplant eligibility to waitlist than PF patients (329 vs 2,369 days, respectively [25th percentile], p < 0.05). Patients with PF and CF both faced delays from eligibility to referral and waitlist.
Quality improvement efforts are needed to better identify and refer appropriate patients for lung transplant evaluation. Targeted interventions may facilitate more efficient evaluation completion and waitlist appearance.
自2005年以来,肺分配评分(LAS)已将患者受益和移植后生存率作为优先考量因素,将等待移植的时间缩短至不到200天,并降低了等待名单上的死亡率。当前面临的一个挑战是等待进入等待名单的时间,即患者符合移植条件的诊断与等待名单登记之间的时间。
我们调查了社会人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族、保险、婚姻状况、家庭收入中位数)和临床因素(一秒用力呼气量[FEV]占预测值的百分比、体重指数、抑郁/焦虑、酒精/药物滥用、绝对/相对禁忌证)是否会影响转诊和等待名单登记。我们通过回顾性队列研究,对2006年至2014年在芝加哥大学普通内科住院且符合移植条件标准以及囊性纤维化(CF)和肺纤维化(PF)的国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)计费代码的患者病历进行审查。我们使用Kaplan - Meier曲线和对数秩检验分析了从符合移植条件到转诊、检查和列入等待名单的时间。
总体而言,符合移植条件患者的转诊率为64%。在那些被转诊的患者中,约36%进入了肺移植等待名单。被转诊的CF患者比PF患者更有可能进入移植等待名单(CF为60%,PF为22%,p < 0.05)。此外,CF患者从符合移植条件到进入等待名单的等待时间比PF患者短(分别为329天和2369天[第25百分位数],p < 0.05)。PF和CF患者从符合条件到转诊和进入等待名单均面临延迟。
需要进行质量改进工作,以更好地识别并转诊适合进行肺移植评估的患者。有针对性的干预措施可能有助于更高效地完成评估并进入等待名单。