• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你不能碰这个!驾驶时的面部触碰行为:对健康、卫生和人为因素的影响。

U can't touch this! Face touching behaviour whilst driving: implications for health, hygiene and human factors.

机构信息

Human Factors Research Group, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK.

Transport Safety Research Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):943-959. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2004241. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2021.2004241
PMID:34747334
Abstract

Analysis of thirty-one hours of video-data documenting 36 experienced drivers highlighted the prevalence of face-touching, with 819 contacts identified (mean frequency: 26.4 face touches/hour (FT/h); mean duration: 3.9-seconds). Fewer face-touches occurred in high primary workload conditions (where additional physical/cognitive demands were placed on drivers), compared to low workload (4.4 and 26.1 FT/h, respectively). In 42.5% of touches (or 11.2 FT/h), mucous membrane contact was made, with fingertips (33.1%) and thumbs (35.6%) most commonly employed. Individual behaviours differed (ranging from 5.1 to 90.7 FT/h), but there were no significant differences identified between genders, age-groups or hand used. Results are of relevance from an epidemiological/hygiene perspective within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (and can therefore inform the design of practical solutions and encourage behavioural change to reduce the risk of self-inoculation while driving), but they also help to elucidate how habitual human behaviours are imbricated with the routine accomplishment of tasks.

摘要

分析了 31 小时的视频数据,这些数据记录了 36 名经验丰富的司机的情况,突出了面部触摸的普遍性,共记录到 819 次接触(平均频率:26.4 次/小时(FT/h);平均持续时间:3.9 秒)。与低工作量(对驾驶员有额外的身体/认知要求)相比,高主要工作量条件下的面部触摸次数较少(分别为 4.4 和 26.1 FT/h)。在 42.5%的触摸中(或 11.2 FT/h),接触到了黏膜,最常用的是指尖(33.1%)和拇指(35.6%)。个体行为存在差异(范围从 5.1 到 90.7 FT/h),但在性别、年龄组或使用的手方面没有发现显著差异。这些结果从 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学/卫生角度来看具有相关性(因此可以为设计实用解决方案提供信息,并鼓励改变行为,以降低驾驶时自我接种的风险),但它们也有助于阐明习惯性人类行为是如何与任务的常规完成交织在一起的。

相似文献

1
U can't touch this! Face touching behaviour whilst driving: implications for health, hygiene and human factors.你不能碰这个!驾驶时的面部触碰行为:对健康、卫生和人为因素的影响。
Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):943-959. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2004241. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Face-touching Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Self-inoculation and transmission potentials.新冠疫情期间的面部触碰行为:自我接种和传播潜力。
J Dent Hyg. 2021 Oct;95(5):41-46.
3
Face touching: a frequent habit that has implications for hand hygiene.触摸面部:一种常见习惯,对手部卫生有影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Feb;43(2):112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.015.
4
Face-touching behaviour as a possible correlate of mask-wearing: A video observational study of public place incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic.面部触碰行为可能与戴口罩有关:COVID-19 大流行期间公共场合事件的视频观察研究。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 May;69(3):1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14094. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
Face touching in the time of COVID-19 in Shiraz, Iran.伊朗设拉子 COVID-19 时期的面部接触行为。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Dec;48(12):1559-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Spontaneous face- and eye-touching: Infection risk versus potential microbiome gain.自发性面部和眼部触碰:感染风险与潜在微生物组增益。
Ocul Surf. 2021 Jul;21:64-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Can Face- and Smartphone-Touching Behaviors Be Altered with Personal Hygiene Reminders during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period? An Observational Study.新冠疫情期间,个人卫生提示能否改变面部触碰和手机触碰行为?一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 24;18(19):10038. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910038.
8
Most self-touches are with the nondominant hand.大多数自慰都是用非优势手进行的。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 26;10(1):10457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67521-5.
9
Association of a Public Health Campaign About Coronavirus Disease 2019 Promoted by News Media and a Social Influencer With Self-reported Personal Hygiene and Physical Distancing in the Netherlands.新闻媒体和社交媒体影响者联合开展的关于 2019 冠状病毒病的公共卫生宣传活动与荷兰人自我报告的个人卫生和保持身体距离行为之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014323. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14323.
10
Hand-to-face contact behaviors during indoor activities in daily life among Korean adults: an observational pilot study using videotaping.韩国成年人日常生活中室内活动时的手-面接触行为:使用录像观察的初步研究
Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021030. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021030. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Number of Facial Hair Corresponds to Frequency of Spontaneous Face-Touch in Humans.人类面部毛发的数量与自发触摸面部的频率相对应。
Adv Biol (Weinh). 2025 Feb;9(2):e2400243. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400243. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Refraining from spontaneous face touch is linked to personality traits, reduced memory performance and EEG changes.避免自发性的面部触摸与个性特征、记忆力下降和脑电图变化有关。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 25;14(1):14600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64723-z.
3
A hand-targeted auxiliary personal protective equipment for intervention of fomite transmission of viruses.
一种用于干预病毒污染物传播的手部靶向辅助个人防护装备。
Bioeng Transl Med. 2022 Sep 29;8(5):e10411. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10411.
4
The suppression of spontaneous face touch and resulting consequences on memory performance of high and low self-touching individuals.抑制自发性面部触摸以及对高、低自我触摸个体记忆表现的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 23;12(1):8637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12044-4.
5
Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) applications in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and considerations for methods.人类因素与工效学(HFE)在应对 COVID-19 大流行中的应用:方法的经验教训和考虑因素。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103733. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103733. Epub 2022 Mar 7.