Human Factors Research Group, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK.
Transport Safety Research Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):943-959. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2004241. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Analysis of thirty-one hours of video-data documenting 36 experienced drivers highlighted the prevalence of face-touching, with 819 contacts identified (mean frequency: 26.4 face touches/hour (FT/h); mean duration: 3.9-seconds). Fewer face-touches occurred in high primary workload conditions (where additional physical/cognitive demands were placed on drivers), compared to low workload (4.4 and 26.1 FT/h, respectively). In 42.5% of touches (or 11.2 FT/h), mucous membrane contact was made, with fingertips (33.1%) and thumbs (35.6%) most commonly employed. Individual behaviours differed (ranging from 5.1 to 90.7 FT/h), but there were no significant differences identified between genders, age-groups or hand used. Results are of relevance from an epidemiological/hygiene perspective within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (and can therefore inform the design of practical solutions and encourage behavioural change to reduce the risk of self-inoculation while driving), but they also help to elucidate how habitual human behaviours are imbricated with the routine accomplishment of tasks.
分析了 31 小时的视频数据,这些数据记录了 36 名经验丰富的司机的情况,突出了面部触摸的普遍性,共记录到 819 次接触(平均频率:26.4 次/小时(FT/h);平均持续时间:3.9 秒)。与低工作量(对驾驶员有额外的身体/认知要求)相比,高主要工作量条件下的面部触摸次数较少(分别为 4.4 和 26.1 FT/h)。在 42.5%的触摸中(或 11.2 FT/h),接触到了黏膜,最常用的是指尖(33.1%)和拇指(35.6%)。个体行为存在差异(范围从 5.1 到 90.7 FT/h),但在性别、年龄组或使用的手方面没有发现显著差异。这些结果从 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学/卫生角度来看具有相关性(因此可以为设计实用解决方案提供信息,并鼓励改变行为,以降低驾驶时自我接种的风险),但它们也有助于阐明习惯性人类行为是如何与任务的常规完成交织在一起的。