Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Mar 24;107(4):1127-1139. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab810.
Physical inactivity promotes insulin resistance and increases the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Recently introduced clustering based on simple clinical measures identified diabetes subgroups (clusters) with different risks of diabetes-related comorbidities and complications.
This study aims to determine differences in physical fitness and cardiovascular risk between diabetes subgroups and a glucose-tolerant control group (CON). We hypothesized that the severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) subgroup would be associated with lower physical fitness and increased cardiovascular risk.
The physical fitness and cardiovascular risk of 746 participants with recent-onset diabetes (diabetes duration of < 12 months, aged 18-69 years) and 74 CONs of the German Diabetes Study (GDS), a prospective longitudinal cohort study, were analyzed. Main outcome measures included physical fitness (VO2max from spiroerogometry), endothelial function (flow- and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation), and cardiovascular risk scores (Framingham Risk Scores for Coronary Heart Disease [FRS-CHD] and Atherosclerotic CardioVascular Disease [ASCVD] risk score).
VO2max was lower in SIRD than in CON, severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID) (both P < .001), and mild age-related diabetes (MARD) (P < .01) subgroups, but not different compared to severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) (P = .98) and moderate obesity-related diabetes (MOD) subgroups (P = .07) after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. Endothelial function was similar among all groups, whereas SAID had lower FRS-CHD and ASCVD than SIRD, MOD, and MARD (all P < .001).
Despite comparable endothelial function across all groups, SIRD showed the lowest physical fitness. Of note, SAID had the lowest cardiovascular risk within the first year after diabetes diagnosis compared to the other diabetes subgroups.
身体活动不足会导致胰岛素抵抗,增加糖尿病和心血管疾病的风险。最近引入的基于简单临床指标的聚类方法,确定了具有不同糖尿病相关合并症和并发症风险的糖尿病亚组(聚类)。
本研究旨在确定糖尿病亚组与葡萄糖耐受对照(CON)组之间在体能和心血管风险方面的差异。我们假设严重胰岛素抵抗性糖尿病(SIRD)亚组与较低的体能和增加的心血管风险相关。
分析了德国糖尿病研究(GDS)中 746 名新近诊断的糖尿病患者(糖尿病病程<12 个月,年龄 18-69 岁)和 74 名 CON 的体能和心血管风险,这是一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。主要结局指标包括体能(来自心肺运动测试的 VO2max)、内皮功能(血流介导和硝酸甘油介导的扩张)和心血管风险评分(Framingham 冠心病风险评分 [FRS-CHD]和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病 [ASCVD]风险评分)。
与 CON、严重自身免疫性糖尿病(SAID)(均 P<0.001)和轻度年龄相关性糖尿病(MARD)(P<0.01)亚组相比,SIRD 的 VO2max 较低,但与严重胰岛素缺乏性糖尿病(SIDD)(P=0.98)和中度肥胖相关性糖尿病(MOD)亚组相比无差异(P=0.07),调整年龄、性别和体重指数后。所有组的内皮功能相似,而 SAID 的 FRS-CHD 和 ASCVD 低于 SIRD、MOD 和 MARD(均 P<0.001)。
尽管所有组的内皮功能相似,但 SIRD 的体能最低。值得注意的是,与其他糖尿病亚组相比,SAID 在糖尿病诊断后的第一年具有最低的心血管风险。