• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊室不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别低危胸痛:HE-MACS 和 HEAR 风险评分的验证研究。

Identifying low-risk chest pain in the emergency department without troponin testing: a validation study of the HE-MACS and HEAR risk scores.

机构信息

Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

Emergency Department, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2022 Jul;39(7):515-518. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211669. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2021-211669
PMID:34753776
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients presenting to EDs with chest pain of possible cardiac origin represent a substantial and challenging cohort to risk stratify. Scores such as HE-MACS (History and Electrocardiogram-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision aid) and HEAR (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors) have been developed to stratify risk without the need for troponin testing. Validation of these scores remains limited.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the Limit of Detection and ECG discharge strategy randomised-controlled trial dataset (n=629; June 2018 to March 2019; 8 UK hospitals) to calculate HEAR and HE-MACS scores. A <4% risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days using HE-MACS and a score of <2 calculated using HEAR defined 'very low risk' patients suitable for discharge. The primary outcome of MACE at 30 days was used to assess diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

MACE within 30 days occurred in 42/629 (7%) of the cohort. HE-MACS and HEAR scores identified 85/629 and 181/629 patients as 'very low risk', with MACE occurring in 0/85 and 1/181 patients, respectively. The sensitivities of each score for ruling out MACE were 100% (95% CI: 91.6% to 100%) for HE-MACS and 97.6% (95% CI: 87.7% to 99.9%) for HEAR. Presenting symptoms within these scores were poorly predictive, with only diaphoresis reaching statistical significance (OR: 4.99 (2.33 to 10.67)). Conventional cardiovascular risk factors and clinician suspicion were related to the presence of MACE at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

HEAR and HE-MACS show potential as rule out tools for acute myocardial infarction without the need for troponin testing. However, prospective studies are required to further validate these scores.

摘要

简介

因可能的心脏原因到急诊科就诊的胸痛患者是一个需要进行风险分层的重要且具有挑战性的人群。HE-MACS(仅基于病史和心电图的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策辅助工具)和 HEAR(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素)等评分已被开发出来,用于在无需进行肌钙蛋白检测的情况下进行风险分层。这些评分的验证仍然有限。

方法

我们对 Limit of Detection and ECG discharge strategy 随机对照试验数据集(n=629;2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 3 月;8 家英国医院)进行了事后分析,以计算 HEAR 和 HE-MACS 评分。使用 HE-MACS 计算的 30 天内主要不良心脏事件(MACE)风险<4%和使用 HEAR 计算的<2 分定义为“极低风险”患者适合出院。30 天内的 MACE 主要结局用于评估诊断准确性。

结果

629 例患者中有 42 例(7%)在 30 天内发生 MACE。HE-MACS 和 HEAR 评分将 85/629 和 181/629 例患者归类为“极低风险”,其中 0/85 例和 1/181 例患者发生 MACE。两种评分对排除 MACE 的敏感度分别为 100%(95%CI:91.6%至 100%)和 97.6%(95%CI:87.7%至 99.9%)。这些评分中的表现症状预测价值较低,只有出汗达到统计学意义(OR:4.99(2.33 至 10.67))。传统心血管危险因素和临床医生的怀疑与 30 天内 MACE 的发生有关。

结论

HEAR 和 HE-MACS 有可能成为无需肌钙蛋白检测即可排除急性心肌梗死的工具。然而,需要前瞻性研究来进一步验证这些评分。

相似文献

1
Identifying low-risk chest pain in the emergency department without troponin testing: a validation study of the HE-MACS and HEAR risk scores.在急诊室不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别低危胸痛:HE-MACS 和 HEAR 风险评分的验证研究。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jul;39(7):515-518. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211669. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
2
Prehospital Comparison of the HEAR and HE-MACS Scores for 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前HEAR和HE-MACS评分对30天不良心脏事件的比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(1):23-29. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2142343. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Validating the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) and Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) rules for the prediction of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.验证曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(MACS)和仅肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(T-MACS)规则对因胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者急性心肌梗死的预测价值。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Aug;34(8):517-523. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206366. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
4
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Comparison of four decision aids for the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.比较四种决策辅助工具在急诊科急性冠状动脉综合征早期诊断中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jan;37(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208898. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule: validation with a new automated assay for heart-type fatty acid binding protein.曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(MACS)决策规则:采用一种新的心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白自动检测方法进行验证
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):769-74. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204235. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
External validation of a low HEAR score to identify emergency department chest pain patients at very low risk of major adverse cardiac events without troponin testing.低HEAR评分用于识别无需肌钙蛋白检测、发生重大不良心脏事件风险极低的急诊科胸痛患者的外部验证。
CJEM. 2022 Jan;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00159-y. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
8
External Validation of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule.曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):136-43. doi: 10.1111/acem.12860. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
9
Enhanced triage for patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: the History and Electrocardiogram-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision aid.增强疑似心前区疼痛患者的分诊:仅病史和心电图的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策辅助工具。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):356-361. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000575.
10
Comparison of the T-MACS score with the TIMI score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.比较 T-MACS 评分与 TIMI 评分在以胸痛为主诉就诊于急诊科的患者中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of HEART, T-MACS, and HE-MACS scores for risk stratification and management of patients with chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科中用于胸痛患者风险分层及管理的HEART、T-MACS和HE-MACS评分的比较评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041432.
2
Performance of computerized self-reported medical history taking and HEAR score for safe early rule-out of cardiac events in acute chest pain patients: the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.计算机化自我报告病史采集及HEAR评分在急性胸痛患者心脏事件安全早期排除中的应用:CLEOS-CPDS前瞻性队列研究
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Nov 12;6(1):104-114. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae087. eCollection 2025 Jan.