Lewis Richard Q, Checkland Kath, Durand Mary Alison, Ling Tom, Mays Nicholas, Roland Martin, Smith Judith A
Nuffield Trust, UK.
Centre for Primary Care and HSR, University of Manchester, UK.
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5631. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
For more than a decade the English NHS has pursued integrated care through three national pilot programmes. The independent evaluators of these programmes here identify several common themes that inform the development of integrated care.
The three pilot programmes shared the aim of better coordination between hospital and community-based health services and between health and social care. Each programme recruited local pilot sites that designed specific interventions to support inter-professional and inter-organisational collaboration.The pilots were highly heterogenous and results varied both within and between the three programmes. While staff were generally positive about their achievements, pilots had mixed success especially in reducing unplanned hospital admissions. Common facilitators to achieving pilots' objectives included effective senior leadership and shared values, simple interventions and additional funding. Barriers included short timescales, poor professional engagement, information and data sharing problems, and conflicts with changing national policy.
There was little stable or shared understanding of what 'integrated care' meant resulting in different practices and priorities. An increasing focus on reducing unplanned hospital use among national sponsors created a mismatch in expectations between local and national actors.
Pilots in all three national programmes made some headway against their objectives but were limited in their impact on unplanned hospital admissions.
十多年来,英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)通过三个全国性试点项目推行整合式医疗服务。这些项目的独立评估人员在此确定了几个为整合式医疗服务发展提供依据的共同主题。
这三个试点项目的共同目标是更好地协调医院与社区卫生服务之间以及医疗与社会护理之间的关系。每个项目都招募了当地的试点地点,这些地点设计了具体的干预措施来支持跨专业和跨组织的合作。这些试点具有高度的异质性,三个项目内部和之间的结果各不相同。虽然工作人员总体上对他们的成就持积极态度,但试点的成功程度参差不齐,尤其是在减少非计划住院方面。实现试点目标的共同促进因素包括有效的高层领导和共同价值观、简单的干预措施以及额外的资金。障碍包括时间紧迫、专业参与度低、信息和数据共享问题以及与不断变化的国家政策的冲突。
对于“整合式医疗服务”的含义,几乎没有稳定或共同的理解,导致了不同的做法和优先事项。国家资助者越来越关注减少非计划住院的使用,这导致了地方和国家行为者之间的期望不匹配。
所有三个国家项目中的试点都在一定程度上朝着其目标取得了进展,但对非计划住院的影响有限。