Kim Ji Soo, Kwon Joong Keun, Kim Nam Jeong, Lee Ji Ho
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021 Apr 20;33:e11. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e11. eCollection 2021.
Pure-tone audiometry is used as a gold standard for hearing measurement. However, since communication in the work environment occurs in noise, it might be difficult to evaluate the actual communication ability accurately based on pure-tone audiometry only. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate speech intelligibility in noisy environments by using Speech-in-Noise Tests and to check its relationship with pure-tone audiometry.
From January 2017 to September 2018, for 362 workers who visited a university hospital for the purpose of compensating for noise-induced hearing loss, several tests were conducted: pure-tone audiometry, speech reception threshold, speech discrimination score, and Speech-in-Noise Tests (Words-in-Noise Test [WIN] and quick-Hearing-in-Noise Test [quick-HINT]). The subjects were classified into serviceable hearing group and non-serviceable hearing group based on 40 dB hearing level (HL) pure-tone average. In both groups, we conducted age-adjusted partial correlation analysis in order to find out the relationship between pure-tone threshold, speech reception threshold, speech discrimination score and WIN and quick-HINT respectively.
In non-serviceable hearing group, all results of partial correlation analysis were statistically significant. However, in serviceable hearing group, there were many results which showed little or no significant relationship between pure-tone threshold and Speech-in-Noise Tests (WIN and quick-HINT).
The relationship between Speech-in-Noise Tests and the pure-tone thresholds were different by the hearing impairment levels; in mild to moderate hearing loss workers, there was little or no relationship; in severe cases, the relationship was significant. It is not enough to predict the speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired persons, especially in mild to moderate level, with pure-tone audiometry only. Therefore, it would be recommended to conduct Speech-in-Noise Test.
纯音听力测试被用作听力测量的金标准。然而,由于工作环境中的交流是在噪声中进行的,仅基于纯音听力测试可能难以准确评估实际的交流能力。因此,本研究的目的是通过使用噪声中的言语测试来评估噪声环境中的言语可懂度,并检查其与纯音听力测试的关系。
2017年1月至2018年9月,对362名因噪声性听力损失到大学医院就诊的工人进行了多项测试:纯音听力测试、言语接受阈、言语辨别得分以及噪声中的言语测试(噪声中的单词测试[WIN]和快速噪声听力测试[quick-HINT])。根据40dB听力级(HL)纯音平均值将受试者分为听力正常组和听力不正常组。在两组中,我们进行了年龄调整的偏相关分析,以分别找出纯音阈值、言语接受阈、言语辨别得分与WIN和quick-HINT之间的关系。
在听力不正常组中,所有偏相关分析结果均具有统计学意义。然而,在听力正常组中,有许多结果显示纯音阈值与噪声中的言语测试(WIN和quick-HINT)之间几乎没有或没有显著关系。
噪声中的言语测试与纯音阈值之间 的关系因听力损伤程度而异;在轻度至中度听力损失的工人中,几乎没有或没有关系;在严重病例中,关系显著。仅用纯音听力测试不足以预测听力受损者的言语可懂度,尤其是在轻度至中度水平。因此,建议进行噪声中的言语测试。