Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 May 5;77(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab338.
To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical frailty, the clinical representation of accelerated biological aging, and antidepressant medication response in older adults with depressive illness.
An 8-week randomized placebo-controlled trial (escitalopram or duloxetine) followed by 10 months of open antidepressant medication treatment (augmentation, switch strategies) was conducted in an outpatient research clinic. 121 adults aged 60 years or older with major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder and a 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) ≥16 were enrolled. Primary measures assessed serially over 12 months include response (50% reduction from baseline HRSD score), remission (HRSD score <10), and frailty (non/intermediate frail [0-2 deficits] vs frail [≥3 deficits]); latent class analysis was used to classify longitudinal frailty trajectories.
A 2-class model best fit the data, identifying a consistently low frailty risk (63% of the sample) and consistently high frailty risk (37% of the sample) trajectory. Response and remission rates (ps ≤ .002) for adults in the high-risk frailty class were at least 21 percentage points worse than those in the low-risk class over 12 months. Furthermore, subsequent frailty was associated with previous frailty (ps ≤ .01) but not previous response or remission (ps ≥ .10).
Antidepressant medication is poorly effective for MDD occurring in the context of frailty in older adults. Furthermore, even when an antidepressant response is achieved, this response does little to improve their frailty. These data suggest that standard psychiatric assessment of depressed older adults should include frailty measures and that novel therapeutic strategies to address comorbid frailty and depression are needed.
研究老年人抑郁障碍患者身体虚弱、加速生物学衰老的临床表现与抗抑郁药物反应之间的纵向关系。
在一个门诊研究诊所中进行了一项为期 8 周的随机安慰剂对照试验(艾司西酞普兰或度洛西汀),随后进行了 10 个月的开放性抗抑郁药物治疗(增效、转换策略)。招募了 121 名年龄在 60 岁或以上、患有重性抑郁障碍(MDD)或持续性抑郁障碍且汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)总分≥16 的成年人。主要措施在 12 个月内连续评估,包括反应(HRSD 评分较基线降低 50%)、缓解(HRSD 评分<10)和虚弱(非/中度虚弱[0-2 项缺陷]与虚弱[≥3 项缺陷]);使用潜在类别分析对纵向虚弱轨迹进行分类。
一个 2 类模型最适合数据,确定了一致的低虚弱风险(样本的 63%)和一致的高虚弱风险(样本的 37%)轨迹。高危虚弱类别的成年人的反应和缓解率(p ≤.002)在 12 个月内至少比低危类别的成年人差 21 个百分点。此外,先前的虚弱与先前的虚弱相关(p ≤.01),但与先前的反应或缓解无关(p ≥.10)。
抗抑郁药物对老年抑郁症患者的虚弱状态疗效不佳。此外,即使达到抗抑郁反应,这一反应对改善虚弱状况也收效甚微。这些数据表明,标准的老年抑郁患者精神评估应包括虚弱测量,并且需要新的治疗策略来解决衰弱和抑郁共病。