Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, School of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CiberNed), Spanish National Institute of Health, Carlos iii, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Pharmacol Res. 2021 Dec;174:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105970. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
We have here assessed, using Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-THC) for comparison, the effect of Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ-THCA) and of Δ-tetrahydrocannabivarin (Δ9-THCV) that is mediated by human versions of CB, CB, and CB-CB receptor functional units, expressed in a heterologous system. Binding to the CB and CB receptors was addressed in living cells by means of a homogeneous assay. A biphasic competition curve for the binding to the CB receptor, was obtained for Δ-THCV in cells expressing the two receptors. Signaling studies included cAMP level determination, activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and ß-arrestin recruitment were performed. The signaling triggered by Δ-THCA and Δ-THCV via individual receptors or receptor heteromers disclosed differential bias, i.e. the bias observed using a given phytocannabinoid depended on the receptor (CB, CB or CB-CB) and on the compound used as reference to calculate the bias factor (Δ-THC, a selective agonist or a non-selective agonist). These results are consistent with different binding modes leading to differential functional selectivity depending on the agonist structure, and the state (monomeric or heteromeric) of the cannabinoid receptor. In addition, on studying Gi-coupling we showed that Δ-THCV and Δ-THCA and Δ-THCV were able to revert the effect of a selective CB receptor agonist, but only Δ9-THCV, and not Δ9-THCA, reverted the effect of arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide (ACEA 100 nM) a selective agonist of the CB receptor. Overall, these results indicate that cannabinoids may have a variety of binding modes that results in qualitatively different effects depending on the signaling pathway that is engaged upon cannabinoid receptor activation.
我们使用Δ-四氢大麻酚(Δ-THC)进行了比较,评估了Δ-四氢大麻酸(Δ-THCA)和Δ-四氢大麻素(Δ9-THCV)的作用,这些作用是通过在异源系统中表达的人 CB、CB 和 CB-CB 受体功能单元介导的。通过均相测定法在活细胞中研究了 CB 和 CB 受体的结合。在表达两种受体的细胞中,获得了针对 Δ9-THCV 的 CB 受体结合的双相竞争曲线。信号研究包括 cAMP 水平测定、丝裂原激活蛋白激酶途径的激活和 β-抑制蛋白募集。通过单独的受体或受体异源二聚体触发的 Δ-THCA 和 Δ-THCV 信号转导揭示了不同的偏向性,即使用特定植物大麻素观察到的偏向性取决于受体(CB、CB 或 CB-CB)和用作计算偏向性因子的化合物(Δ-THC、选择性激动剂或非选择性激动剂)。这些结果与不同的结合模式一致,这些模式导致不同的功能选择性,这取决于激动剂结构和大麻素受体的状态(单体或异源二聚体)。此外,在研究 Gi 偶联时,我们表明 Δ-THCV 和 Δ-THCA 和 Δ-THCV 能够逆转选择性 CB 受体激动剂的作用,但只有 Δ9-THCV,而不是 Δ9-THCA,能够逆转阿魏酰-2'-氯乙基酰胺(ACEA 100 nM)的作用,阿魏酰-2'-氯乙基酰胺是 CB 受体的选择性激动剂。总体而言,这些结果表明,大麻素可能具有多种结合模式,这导致在大麻素受体激活时根据所涉及的信号通路产生定性不同的效果。