Kumar Niraj, Bindra Ashish, Singh Gyaninder Pal, Goyal Keshav, Chaturvedi Arvind, Yadav Naveen, Yadav Arun Kumar
Department of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Trainee Medical Officer, Mount Gambier Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul-Sep;37(3):342-346. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_185_19. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
Posterior vessel wall puncture (PVWP) is a common complication of ultrasound (US) guided central venous cannulation. We evaluated and compared the frequency of PWVP of internal jugular vein using short axis (SA) and long axis (LA) approach of US-guided needle cannulation. As a secondary objective incidence of carotid puncture was assessed.
Prospective, single-blinded, cross over, observational study at Urban Level I Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care Department. Residents receiving standard education on ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation were asked to place an US-guided catheter using either short axis or long axis approach on a human torso mannequin. During the procedure, the path of the needle was carefully observed by the investigator for any PVWP and carotid puncture without interference with the placement procedure. The confidence level of the resident for the intraluminal placement of the needle tip was measured on a 10-point Likert scale.
Forty residents participated in the study. The incidence of PVWP in SA and LA group was 40% and 17.5% respectively and was statistically significant (p = 0.026). There was no incidence of carotid artery puncture in either of the group. The mean confidence of intraluminal placement of needle was significantly higher in the LA group (8.32) as compared to the SA group (5.95).
Lower incidence of PVWP was seen in LA as compared to the SA approach during US-guided IJV cannulation in phantom in residents having previous experience of CVC (central venous cannulation) in landmark technique only. Participants were more confident about intraluminal needle placement in the LA group compared to the SA group.
后血管壁穿刺(PVWP)是超声(US)引导下中心静脉置管的常见并发症。我们评估并比较了使用超声引导下短轴(SA)和长轴(LA)进针技术进行颈内静脉置管时PVWP的发生率。作为次要目标,评估颈动脉穿刺的发生率。
在城市一级神经麻醉与重症监护病房进行前瞻性、单盲、交叉、观察性研究。要求接受过超声引导下中心静脉置管标准教育的住院医师,在人体躯干模型上使用短轴或长轴进针技术放置超声引导下的导管。在操作过程中,研究者仔细观察针的路径,以发现任何PVWP和颈动脉穿刺情况,同时不干扰置管操作。住院医师对针尖置于管腔内的信心程度采用10分制李克特量表进行测量。
40名住院医师参与了该研究。SA组和LA组的PVWP发生率分别为40%和17.5%,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.026)。两组均未发生颈动脉穿刺。LA组针置于管腔内的平均信心程度(8.32)显著高于SA组(5.95)。
在仅具有标志性技术中心静脉置管(CVC)经验的住院医师中,在人体模型上进行超声引导下颈内静脉置管时,与SA进针技术相比,LA进针技术的PVWP发生率更低。与SA组相比,LA组参与者对针置于管腔内更有信心。