Sunny Arin Eliza, Abraham Siju Varghese, Krishnan S Vimal, Rajeev Punchalil Chathappan, Palatty Babu Urumese
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
J Med Ultrasound. 2021 Aug 21;30(2):81-86. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_49_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a frequently performed procedure in the emergency department (ED). We aim to compare two different ultrasound (US)-guided techniques, the short-axis (SAX) approach and the oblique axis (OAX) approach for the insertion of internal jugular vein (IJV) catheters in an ED setting.
This prospective, observational study was conducted in the ED of a single tertiary care teaching hospital on patients requiring IJV cannulation. CVC placement was done using both the SAX and OAX approaches as per the ED physician's discretion. Outcome measures included acute complications, successful insertion of an IJV catheter, number of attempts, and access times. The Chi-square test was used to compare the study variables (acute complications, number of cannulation attempts, and successful cannulation) between the two approaches. Mann-Whitney -test was applied to compare the mean differences of flash time and cannulation time.
Sixty patients were enrolled, of which 30 underwent IJV cannulation by the SAX technique and 30 by the OAX technique. We noted a total of 22 acute complications, 56.7% in the SAX group and 16.7% in the OAX group. A significant incidence of posterior venous wall puncture was noted in the SAX group (50.0%). No significant statistical differences were noted on analysis of other outcome measures.
The OAX approach is a useful alternative technique to IJV cannulation in the ED setting. Further multicentric studies in this domain will be required to consider this technique as the primary approach to US-guided IJV cannulation in the ED setting.
中心静脉导管(CVC)置入是急诊科(ED)经常进行的一项操作。我们旨在比较两种不同的超声(US)引导技术,即短轴(SAX)法和斜轴(OAX)法,用于在急诊科环境中置入颈内静脉(IJV)导管。
这项前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级护理教学医院的急诊科对需要进行IJV置管的患者进行。根据急诊科医生的判断,使用SAX法和OAX法进行CVC置入。观察指标包括急性并发症、IJV导管置入成功、尝试次数和置管时间。采用卡方检验比较两种方法之间的研究变量(急性并发症、置管尝试次数和置管成功)。应用曼-惠特尼检验比较闪回时间和置管时间的平均差异。
共纳入60例患者,其中30例采用SAX技术进行IJV置管,30例采用OAX技术。我们共记录了22例急性并发症,SAX组为56.7%,OAX组为16.7%。SAX组后静脉壁穿刺发生率较高(50.0%)。在分析其他观察指标时未发现显著统计学差异。
在急诊科环境中,OAX法是IJV置管的一种有用的替代技术。在该领域需要进一步进行多中心研究,以将该技术视为急诊科超声引导IJV置管的主要方法。