Changiz Tahereh, Amouzeshi Zahra, Najimi Arash, Adibi Peyman
Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Res Med Sci. 2021 Sep 30;26:69. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_965_19. eCollection 2021.
Extensive research in the past decades has evidenced differences in the psychomotor ability of individuals resulting from varying levels of experience, age, gender, response precision, compatibility, performance, and ability. Many studies have called for the need to identify psychomotor ability and appropriate tests that can assess it. This review article surveys the definition, categorization, and tests of psychomotor ability as well as training based on psychomotor ability in medical sciences. We searched the literature with no time limit, using the ProQuest, PubMed, and Eric databases, as well as the Google Scholar search engine. The keywords for the search involved psychomotor, psychomotor performance, assessment, psychomotor ability, motor learning, education, training, psychomotor ability testing, and psychomotor skills. Other relevant papers found through hand searching and snowballing were also included in the review. The EndNote X8 was employed as a reference manager tool. Only abstracts of the papers whose full texts were accessible were reviewed after repetitious papers were excluded. The documents were categorized into five groups: definition of psychomotor skills and ability, psychomotor ability components, psychomotor ability tests, identification of psychomotor ability (task analysis), and training. This review article revealed that there is not a single definition for psychomotor ability and its components. However, it can be said that motor abilities are the foundation for the rapid acquisition of skills and according to the neuroplasticity process are learned through training and practice. Given psychomotor abilities vary among individuals, training courses should also provide different levels of psychomotor training for learners. The literature introduces psychomotor tests as a selection tool, a predictor of future professional behavior, and a means to evaluate progress in performance, academic guidance (ability-oriented medical specialty), and curriculum implementation tailored to the needs of learners of varying graduate disciplines. The tests should be profession-specific because each profession entails its peculiar characteristics and abilities. On the other hand, the major problem in studying and analyzing underlying psychomotor skills and abilities is that the components are being investigated by researchers from varying, and usually unrelated, scientific fields. Therefore, it is necessary to have a holistic view through close interaction between the researchers of different sciences to better understand this area.
过去几十年的广泛研究证明,个体的心理运动能力因经验、年龄、性别、反应精度、兼容性、表现和能力水平的不同而存在差异。许多研究呼吁有必要识别心理运动能力并找到能够评估它的合适测试。这篇综述文章调查了心理运动能力的定义、分类和测试,以及医学领域基于心理运动能力的培训。我们使用ProQuest、PubMed和Eric数据库以及谷歌学术搜索引擎,对无时间限制的文献进行了检索。检索关键词包括心理运动、心理运动表现、评估、心理运动能力、运动学习、教育、培训、心理运动能力测试和心理运动技能。通过手工检索和滚雪球法找到的其他相关论文也纳入了综述。EndNote X8被用作参考文献管理工具。在排除重复论文后,仅对可获取全文的论文摘要进行了审查。这些文献被分为五组:心理运动技能和能力的定义、心理运动能力组成部分、心理运动能力测试、心理运动能力识别(任务分析)和培训。这篇综述文章表明,心理运动能力及其组成部分没有单一的定义。然而,可以说运动能力是快速掌握技能的基础,并且根据神经可塑性过程,是通过训练和练习习得的。鉴于个体的心理运动能力各不相同,培训课程也应为学习者提供不同水平的心理运动训练。文献将心理运动测试介绍为一种选拔工具、未来职业行为的预测指标,以及评估表现进步、学业指导(能力导向型医学专业)和根据不同研究生学科学习者需求定制课程实施情况的手段。测试应该针对特定职业,因为每个职业都有其独特的特点和能力。另一方面,研究和分析潜在心理运动技能和能力的主要问题是,研究人员来自不同的、通常不相关的科学领域,正在对这些组成部分进行研究。因此,有必要通过不同学科研究人员之间的密切互动形成整体观点,以便更好地理解这一领域。