Usman Sana, Kahrs Birgitte, Barton Helen, Salvesen Kjell, Moe Eggebo Torbjorn, Lees Christoph
Department of Cancer and Surgery Institute of Reproductive Developmental Biology Hammersmith Campus Du Cane Road London W12 ONN UK.
Centre for Fetal Care Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Du Cane Road London W12 0HS UK.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jan 21;22(2):111-117. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12121. eCollection 2019 May.
To compare the duration of vacuum and forceps delivery in relation to ultrasound assessment of fetal head position and station.
A prospective single-centre cohort study in nulliparous women at term with prolonged second stage of labour. Fetal head position was determined using transabdominal ultrasound and station as head-perineum distance (HPD) from transperineal ultrasound prior to an instrument. The primary outcome was duration of vacuum and forceps to vaginal delivery and was analysed as survival expressed by hazard ratio (HR). Secondary outcomes were delivery mode and immediate neonatal outcome.
In the study population of 54 women, the primary instrument was vacuum for 36 and forceps for 18. Four women were delivered by Caesarean section. Estimated median duration for forceps deliveries was 5 min (95% CI 4.0-6.0) vs. 9 min (95% CI 7.3-10.6) for vacuum deliveries (P = 0.17; Log-rank test). The HR for vaginal delivery was 2.02 (95% CI 1.04-3.91, P = 0.038) after adjusting for HPD, maternal age and BMI. OP position had minor influence on the primary outcome (HR changed from 2.02 to 2.08). The first instrument failed in 11/31 (35.5%) where HPD > 35 mm vs. 2/21 (9.5%) where HPD ≤ 35 mm (P < 0.05). There were no cases of Apgar score <7 at 5 min or umbilical artery pH < 7.1.
In prolonged second stage, delivery with forceps was achieved more quickly than by vacuum when matched for ultrasound determined head station. Irrespective of which was the primary instrument, the failure rate was greater at higher head stations.
比较与胎儿头部位置和胎头双顶径超声评估相关的真空吸引和产钳分娩的持续时间。
一项针对足月初产妇第二产程延长的前瞻性单中心队列研究。在使用器械前,通过经腹超声确定胎儿头部位置,并通过经会阴超声测量胎头双顶径作为头-会阴距离(HPD)来确定胎头位置。主要结局是真空吸引和产钳助产至阴道分娩的持续时间,并以风险比(HR)表示的生存率进行分析。次要结局是分娩方式和新生儿即时结局。
在54名女性的研究人群中,主要器械为真空吸引器的有36例,产钳的有18例。4名女性通过剖宫产分娩。产钳分娩的估计中位持续时间为5分钟(95%CI 4.0 - 6.0),而真空吸引分娩为9分钟(95%CI 7.3 - 10.6)(P = 0.17;对数秩检验)。在调整HPD、产妇年龄和BMI后,阴道分娩的HR为2.02(95%CI 1.04 - 3.91,P = 0.038)。枕后位对主要结局影响较小(HR从2.02变为2.08)。当HPD > 35 mm时,11/31(35.5%)的首次器械使用失败,而当HPD≤35 mm时,2/21(9.5%)失败(P < 0.05)。5分钟时无阿氏评分<7或脐动脉pH < 7.1的病例。
在第二产程延长时,当根据超声确定的胎头位置进行匹配时,产钳助产比真空吸引更快完成。无论主要器械是哪种,胎头位置较高时失败率更高。