Zhang Ye, Ma Ning-Ye
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 25;8:680833. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680833. eCollection 2021.
The association between a diverse array of environmental risk factors and the risk of endometriosis is contradictory. To summarize the evidence of associations between environmental risk factors and the risk of endometriosis. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrial.gov were systematically searched in June 2020. Meta-analyses of observational studies investigated any environmental exposure (non-genetic) and endometriosis risk. For each article, we estimated the summary effect size, 95% CIs, and the 95% prediction interval (PI). We also estimated the between-study heterogeneity expressed by , evidence for small-study effects, and evidence of excess significance bias. About 12 eligible articles (featuring 143,422 cases and 5,112,967 participants) yielded data on 40 unique environmental risk factors, including life styles ( = 16), reproductive factors ( = 3), early life factors ( = 4), and a range of other risk factors [e.g., phthalate metabolites, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and body mass index (BMI)]. About 25 of these 40 associations (62.5%) were statistically significant ( < 0.05) under random-effects models. Evidence for an association was indicated for alcohol intake [relative risk (RR): 1.25; 95% CI: 1.11-1.41] and the exposure to endocrine disruptor chemicals (EDCs) (RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.23-1.60) while 15 associations presented only weak evidence. Our analyses showed that alcohol intake and exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may be potential risk factors for endometriosis and supported by suggestive epidemiological evidence. However, it was evident that there was substantial heterogeneity and/or bias between the different studies featured in various meta-analyses included in this review; therefore, the outcomes of our analysis should be interpreted cautiously.
一系列不同的环境风险因素与子宫内膜异位症风险之间的关联相互矛盾。为总结环境风险因素与子宫内膜异位症风险之间关联的证据,于2020年6月对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和ClinicalTrial.gov等数据库进行了系统检索。对观察性研究进行荟萃分析,调查任何环境暴露(非遗传)与子宫内膜异位症风险。对于每篇文章,我们估计了汇总效应量、95%置信区间(CI)和95%预测区间(PI)。我们还估计了由 表示的研究间异质性、小研究效应的证据以及过度显著性偏差的证据。约12篇符合条件的文章(涉及143422例病例和5112967名参与者)提供了40种独特环境风险因素的数据,包括生活方式( = 16)、生殖因素( = 3)、早期生活因素( = 4)以及一系列其他风险因素[例如邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物、内分泌干扰化学物质和体重指数(BMI)]。在随机效应模型下,这40种关联中约25种(62.5%)具有统计学显著性( < 0.05)。酒精摄入[相对风险(RR):1.25;95% CI:1.11 - 1.41]和接触内分泌干扰化学物质(EDC)(RR:1.41;95% CI:1.23 - 1.60)显示存在关联证据,而15种关联仅呈现微弱证据。我们的分析表明,酒精摄入和接触内分泌干扰化学物质可能是子宫内膜异位症的潜在风险因素,并有提示性的流行病学证据支持。然而,很明显,本综述纳入的各种荟萃分析中的不同研究之间存在大量异质性和/或偏差;因此,对我们分析的结果应谨慎解释。