• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单巢轮虫基因组大小多样性的首次评估。

A first assessment of genome size diversity in Monogonont rotifers.

作者信息

Stelzer Claus-Peter

出版信息

Hydrobiologia. 2011 Mar;662(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s10750-010-0487-1. Epub 2010 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10750-010-0487-1
PMID:34764494
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611972/
Abstract

This study provides the first analysis of genome size diversity in Monogonont rotifers. Measurements were made using flow cytometry, with and chicken erythrocytes as internal standards. Nuclear DNA content ("2C"- assuming diploid genomes) in eight different species of four different genera ranged almost fourfold, from 0.12 to 0.46 pg. A comparison with previously published values for Bdelloid rotifers suggested that the genomes of Monogononts are significantly smaller than those of Bdelloids. When compared to other Metazoans, Monogonont rotifers seem to have relatively small genomes. For instance, the C-values of the two species with the smallest genomes, and , were only 0.06 and 0.085 pg, respectively. Various explanations for genome size diversity within Monogononta are discussed.

摘要

本研究首次分析了单巢轮虫的基因组大小多样性。使用流式细胞仪进行测量,以鲑鱼精子DNA和鸡红细胞作为内标。四个不同属的八个不同物种的核DNA含量(“2C”——假设为二倍体基因组)范围几乎达四倍,从0.12到0.46皮克。与先前发表的蛭形轮虫数值相比,表明单巢轮虫的基因组明显小于蛭形轮虫的基因组。与其他后生动物相比,单巢轮虫似乎具有相对较小的基因组。例如,基因组最小的两个物种,即褶皱臂尾轮虫和壶状臂尾轮虫的C值分别仅为0.06和0.085皮克。文中讨论了单巢目内基因组大小多样性的各种解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de2/7611972/c40623c0dffd/EMS137980-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de2/7611972/b40224a33a80/EMS137980-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de2/7611972/c40623c0dffd/EMS137980-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de2/7611972/b40224a33a80/EMS137980-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de2/7611972/c40623c0dffd/EMS137980-f002.jpg

相似文献

1
A first assessment of genome size diversity in Monogonont rotifers.单巢轮虫基因组大小多样性的首次评估。
Hydrobiologia. 2011 Mar;662(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s10750-010-0487-1. Epub 2010 Oct 3.
2
Trehalose in desiccated rotifers: a comparison between a bdelloid and a monogonont species.脱水轮虫中的海藻糖:一种蛭态轮虫和一种单巢轮虫物种之间的比较。
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2004 Dec;139(4):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.10.019.
3
The genome of the freshwater monogonont rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus.淡水纤毛虫轮虫 Brachionus calyciflorus 的基因组。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 May;18(3):646-655. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12768. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
Multiple functionally divergent and conserved copies of alpha tubulin in bdelloid rotifers.蛭形轮虫中多个功能分化且保守的α微管蛋白拷贝。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Aug 17;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-148.
5
Monogonont Rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus, Possesses Exceptionally Large, Fragmented Mitogenome.单巢轮虫,萼花臂尾轮虫,拥有异常大的、碎片化的线粒体基因组。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 13;11(12):e0168263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168263. eCollection 2016.
6
Genome size and lifestyle in gnesiotrochan rotifers.原始轮虫的基因组大小与生活方式
Hydrobiologia. 2019 Nov;844(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3873-8. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Genome-wide identification of DNA double-strand break repair genes and transcriptional modulation in response to benzo[α]pyrene in the monogonont rotifer Brachionus spp.基因组范围内鉴定 DNA 双链断裂修复基因,并研究苯并[a]芘对单巢轮虫属 Brachionus spp. 的转录调控
Aquat Toxicol. 2020 Oct;227:105614. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105614. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Small, but surprisingly repetitive genomes: transposon expansion and not polyploidy has driven a doubling in genome size in a metazoan species complex.小型但令人惊讶的重复基因组:转座子扩张而不是多倍体导致后生动物物种复合体的基因组大小加倍。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5859-y.
9
Complete mitochondrial genome of the freshwater monogonont rotifer (Rotifera, Brachionidae).淡水单巢轮虫(轮虫纲,臂尾轮科)的完整线粒体基因组
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2020 Nov 13;5(3):3754-3755. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1835578.
10
Rates of nucleotide substitution in sexual and anciently asexual rotifers.有性和古老无性轮虫的核苷酸替代率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 5;98(12):6720-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111144598. Epub 2001 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Small and Large Genomes Within Monogonont Rotifers.比较单巢轮虫中的小基因组和大基因组。
Genome Biol Evol. 2025 Mar 6;17(3). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf041.
2
Do genome size differences within (Rotifera, Monogononta) cause reproductive barriers among geographic populations?轮虫纲单巢目内的基因组大小差异会导致地理种群间的生殖障碍吗?
Hydrobiologia. 2017 Jul;796(1):59-75. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2872-x. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Genome Size Covaries More Positively with Propagule Size than Adult Size: New Insights into an Old Problem.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome size diversity in the family Drosophilidae.果蝇科的基因组大小多样性。
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Sep;101(3):228-38. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.49. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
2
Obligate asex in a rotifer and the role of sexual signals.一种轮虫的专性孤雌生殖及性信号的作用。
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):287-293. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01437.x. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
3
An analysis of species boundaries and biogeographic patterns in a cryptic species complex: the rotifer--Brachionus plicatilis.一种隐存物种复合体中的物种界限与生物地理模式分析:轮虫——褶皱臂尾轮虫
基因组大小与繁殖体大小的正相关性高于与成体大小的正相关性:对一个老问题的新见解。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;10(4):270. doi: 10.3390/biology10040270.
4
Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions.基因组大小演化:为旧问题寻找新的模式系统。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 26;287(1933):20201441. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1441.
5
The genome, transcriptome, and proteome of the fish parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala).鱼类寄生虫 P. laevis(棘头虫纲)的基因组、转录组和蛋白质组。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0232973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232973. eCollection 2020.
6
Genome size and lifestyle in gnesiotrochan rotifers.原始轮虫的基因组大小与生活方式
Hydrobiologia. 2019 Nov;844(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3873-8. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Small, but surprisingly repetitive genomes: transposon expansion and not polyploidy has driven a doubling in genome size in a metazoan species complex.小型但令人惊讶的重复基因组:转座子扩张而不是多倍体导致后生动物物种复合体的基因组大小加倍。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5859-y.
8
Copper Affects Composition and Functioning of Microbial Communities in Marine Biofilms at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations.铜在环境相关浓度下影响海洋生物膜中微生物群落的组成和功能。
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 8;9:3248. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03248. eCollection 2018.
9
Inventory and phylogenetic analysis of meiotic genes in monogonont rotifers.单巢轮虫减数分裂基因的鉴定和系统发育分析。
J Hered. 2013 May-Jun;104(3):357-70. doi: 10.1093/jhered/est011. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
Genome size evolution at the speciation level: the cryptic species complex Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera).种间水平的基因组大小进化:褶皱臂尾轮虫(轮虫动物门)的隐种复合体。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Apr 7;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-90.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Oct;41(1):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.025. Epub 2006 May 11.
4
Preparation of samples for comparative studies of arthropod chromosomes: visualization, in situ hybridization, and genome size estimation.用于节肢动物染色体比较研究的样本制备:可视化、原位杂交和基因组大小估计。
Methods Enzymol. 2005;395:460-88. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95025-8.
5
Flow cytometric DNA analysis of human cancer cell lines.人癌细胞系的流式细胞术DNA分析
Methods Mol Med. 2004;88:247-55. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-406-9:247.
6
The origins of genome complexity.基因组复杂性的起源。
Science. 2003 Nov 21;302(5649):1401-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1089370.
7
Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera).古代隐存物种复合体中的物种形成:来自褶皱臂尾轮虫(轮虫纲)分子系统发育的证据
Evolution. 2002 Jul;56(7):1431-44. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01455.x.
8
From pixels to picograms: a beginners' guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry.从像素到皮克:基于福尔根图像分析密度测定法的基因组定量初学者指南。
J Histochem Cytochem. 2002 Jun;50(6):735-49. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000601.
9
Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma.巧合、共同进化还是因果关系?DNA含量、细胞大小与C值之谜。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Feb;76(1):65-101. doi: 10.1017/s1464793100005595.