Alam Edris, Al Abdouli Khameis, Khamis Amar Hassan, Bhuiyan Hafiz Uddin, Rahman Kazi Abdur
Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, 4331, Bangladesh.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 1;14:4425-4437. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S327881. eCollection 2021.
Although the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) developed some policy initiatives during the first phase of COVID-19, their efforts were questioned due to indecision, late policy decisions and implementation, and a proliferation of fake testing and fake news. As such, this research aims to examine public trust in preparedness and response measures undertaken by both the GoB and private sector organisations in Bangladesh between January and May 2020.
A cross-sectional survey method was applied to a sample of Bangladeshi residents using a questionnaire distributed between April and June 2020. Three hundred and seven respondents participated in an online questionnaire that was disseminated on online outlets, such as e-mail, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp. The survey questionnaire was distributed to potential respondents, and continuous-chain messages were provided. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA).
Of the 307 participants, 77% were male and 23% were female. Findings suggest that the participants showed greater approval of private sector responses than of governmental preparedness and response activities. For preparedness activities, participants were negative about both the GoB efforts to organize and provide personal protective equipment (PPE) for doctors in time as a safeguard against COVID-19, and also the lack of coordination and informed decision-making in relation to facing COVID-19. Respondents were asked to share their perception of the suitability of GoB pandemic management plans, as evidenced by plan effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A lower level of trust was demonstrated by the Bangladeshis with regard to preparedness and response measures taken in Bangladesh. Based on participants' concerns and suggestions and a review of drawback of policy responses in the early stage, a set of recommendations are provided for future pandemics like public health emergency risk management in Bangladesh.
尽管孟加拉国政府(GoB)在新冠疫情第一阶段制定了一些政策举措,但由于决策犹豫不决、政策决定和实施滞后,以及虚假检测和假新闻泛滥,其努力受到质疑。因此,本研究旨在调查2020年1月至5月期间孟加拉国公众对政府和私营部门组织在疫情防范和应对措施方面的信任度。
采用横断面调查方法,于2020年4月至6月向孟加拉国居民样本发放问卷。307名受访者参与了通过电子邮件、Facebook Messenger和WhatsApp等在线渠道分发的在线问卷。调查问卷分发给潜在受访者,并提供了连续链式信息。数据采用探索性因素分析(EFA)进行分析。
307名参与者中,77%为男性,23%为女性。结果表明,参与者对私营部门应对措施的认可度高于政府的防范和应对活动。对于防范活动,参与者对政府及时组织并为医生提供个人防护装备(PPE)以防范新冠疫情的努力持负面态度,同时也对面对新冠疫情时缺乏协调和明智决策持负面态度。受访者被要求分享他们对政府大流行管理计划适用性的看法,新冠疫情期间计划的有效性证明了这一点。
孟加拉国公众对该国采取的防范和应对措施的信任度较低。基于参与者的关切和建议以及对早期政策应对缺陷的审查,为未来类似孟加拉国公共卫生应急风险管理的大流行提供了一系列建议。