Gudina Esayas Kebede, Siebeck Matthias, Eshete Million Tesfaye
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Center for International Health at LMU, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 4;14:4511-4521. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S333545. eCollection 2021.
Ethiopia, like many African countries, took immediate actions to contain the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impacts. However, the pandemic control measures were not guided by robust local evidence and not tailored to national contexts. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the evidence gaps and challenges of COVID-19 control measures in Ethiopia during the early months of the pandemic.
Scoping Review.
Searches were conducted in PubMed, LitCovid, Web of Sciences, Embase, MedRx, ChemRxiv, BioRx, and Google Scholar.
Peer-reviewed or pre-print original research articles on COVID-19 from Ethiopia during a period of January 1, 2020 and October 10, 2020 were included in this review.
Of 573 articles found, 64 were eligible for inclusion. However, only 25 of them were peer-reviewed; 78% (50/64) were based on cross-sectional descriptive studies. Most of the studies focused on human behavior and healthcare system; only 13 articles addressed epidemiology and clinical spectrum of COVID-19. The studies have revealed a good level of awareness and a favorable attitude by community and healthcare workers (HCWs) towards COVID-19 and its control. However, the practices of infection prevention were found to be low among HCWs and the community. The outbreak unfolded at a slower rate than initially feared but the impact of the counter measures against COVID-19 on the delivery of essential healthcare services was felt more than the direct impact of the pandemic. Moreover, the actions taken by the country did not appear to be tailored to the pattern of the outbreak and existing local evidence. The overall number of published COVID-19-related scientific articles from Ethiopia during the review period was found to be limited.
COVID-19 control in Ethiopia was challenged by lack of robust local scientific evidence, and the pandemic control measures were not adapted to local context and the outbreak patterns. Thus, Ethiopia and other African countries should design culturally sensitive and locally acceptable public health interventions for COVID-19 and potential future outbreaks based on locally generated scientific evidence.
与许多非洲国家一样,埃塞俄比亚立即采取行动遏制冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情及其影响。然而,疫情防控措施并非基于有力的本地证据,也未针对本国国情量身定制。在本综述中,我们旨在评估疫情最初几个月埃塞俄比亚COVID-19防控措施的证据空白和挑战。
范围综述。
在PubMed、LitCovid、科学网、Embase、MedRx、ChemRxiv、BioRx和谷歌学术进行检索。
本综述纳入了2020年1月1日至2020年10月10日期间来自埃塞俄比亚的关于COVID-19的同行评审或预印本原创研究文章。
在检索到的573篇文章中,64篇符合纳入标准。然而,其中只有25篇经过同行评审;78%(50/64)基于横断面描述性研究。大多数研究聚焦于人类行为和医疗保健系统;只有13篇文章涉及COVID-19的流行病学和临床特征。研究显示社区和医护人员对COVID-19及其防控有较高的认知水平和积极态度。然而,发现医护人员和社区中感染预防措施的执行情况较差。疫情的发展速度比最初担心的要慢,但COVID-19应对措施对基本医疗服务提供的影响比疫情的直接影响更为明显。此外,该国采取的行动似乎并未针对疫情模式和现有的本地证据进行调整。在审查期间,发现埃塞俄比亚发表的与COVID-19相关的科学文章总数有限。
埃塞俄比亚的COVID-19防控面临缺乏有力本地科学证据的挑战,疫情防控措施未适应本地情况和疫情模式。因此,埃塞俄比亚和其他非洲国家应基于本地生成的科学证据,设计对文化敏感且本地可接受的针对COVID-19及未来可能疫情的公共卫生干预措施。