• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哺乳动物不同营养级和栖息地的休息策略差异。

Variation in resting strategies across trophic levels and habitats in mammals.

作者信息

Shukla Ishana, Kilpatrick A Marm, Beltran Roxanne S

机构信息

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz CA USA.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 6;11(21):14405-14415. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8073. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.8073
PMID:34765115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571619/
Abstract

Mammals must carefully balance rest with other behaviors that influence fitness (e.g., foraging, finding a mate) while minimizing predation risk. However, factors influencing resting strategies and the degree to which resting strategies are driven by the activities of predators and/or prey remain largely unknown. Our goal was to examine how mammalian resting strategies varied with trophic level, body mass, and habitat. We reviewed findings from 127 publications and classified the resting strategies of terrestrial and aquatic mammalian species into three categories: social (e.g., resting in groups), temporal (e.g., resting during the day), or spatial (e.g., resting in burrows). Temporal strategies were most common (54% of cases), but the prevalence of strategies varied with body mass and among trophic levels. Specifically, lower trophic levels and smaller species such as rodents and lagomorphs used more spatial and social resting strategies, whereas top predators and larger species used mostly temporal resting strategies. Resting strategies also varied among habitat types (e.g., rainforest vs. grassland), but this was primarily because closely related species shared both habitats and resting strategies. Human presence also affected resting strategies at all trophic levels but most strongly influenced top predators through shifts in rest timing. Human-induced behavioral changes in rest patterns cascade to modify behaviors across multiple trophic levels. These findings advance our fundamental understanding of natural history and ecology in wild animals and provide a roadmap for future comparative studies.

摘要

哺乳动物必须在休息与其他影响适应性的行为(如觅食、寻找配偶)之间谨慎地保持平衡,同时将被捕食风险降至最低。然而,影响休息策略的因素以及休息策略在多大程度上受捕食者和/或猎物活动的驱动,在很大程度上仍不为人知。我们的目标是研究哺乳动物的休息策略如何随营养级、体重和栖息地而变化。我们回顾了127篇出版物的研究结果,并将陆生和水生哺乳动物物种的休息策略分为三类:社会性(如群体休息)、时间性(如白天休息)或空间性(如在洞穴中休息)。时间性策略最为常见(占54%),但这些策略的普遍程度随体重和营养级的不同而有所变化。具体而言,较低的营养级以及诸如啮齿动物和兔形目动物等较小的物种更多地采用空间性和社会性休息策略,而顶级捕食者和较大的物种大多采用时间性休息策略。休息策略在不同的栖息地类型(如雨林与草原)中也有所不同,但这主要是因为亲缘关系相近的物种共享这两种栖息地和休息策略。人类的存在也影响了所有营养级的休息策略,但对顶级捕食者的影响最为强烈,主要是通过休息时间的改变。人类导致的休息模式行为变化会层层递进,改变多个营养级的行为。这些发现推进了我们对野生动物自然史和生态学的基本理解,并为未来的比较研究提供了路线图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/e7aee4e57a65/ECE3-11-14405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/44e00bd4338b/ECE3-11-14405-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/39a2e2c5556b/ECE3-11-14405-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/a65dbadcb57d/ECE3-11-14405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/d46640faf4be/ECE3-11-14405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/c0ec00fb2064/ECE3-11-14405-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/e7aee4e57a65/ECE3-11-14405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/44e00bd4338b/ECE3-11-14405-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/39a2e2c5556b/ECE3-11-14405-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/a65dbadcb57d/ECE3-11-14405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/d46640faf4be/ECE3-11-14405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/c0ec00fb2064/ECE3-11-14405-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8571619/e7aee4e57a65/ECE3-11-14405-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in resting strategies across trophic levels and habitats in mammals.哺乳动物不同营养级和栖息地的休息策略差异。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 6;11(21):14405-14415. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8073. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Does moonlight increase predation risk? Meta-analysis reveals divergent responses of nocturnal mammals to lunar cycles.月光会增加被捕食风险吗?荟萃分析揭示夜间活动的哺乳动物对月周期的不同反应。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Mar;83(2):504-14. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12148. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
3
Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades.种内捕食的空间避难所:对猎物抑制和营养级联的影响。
Oecologia. 2006 Aug;149(2):265-75. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0443-y. Epub 2006 May 18.
4
Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.觅食和脆弱性特征改变了捕食者-猎物的体质量比例关系:以淡水大型无脊椎动物为案例研究。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1031-41. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12078. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
5
Aquatic predation alters a terrestrial prey subsidy.水生捕食改变了陆地猎物的补贴。
Ecology. 2010 May;91(5):1435-44. doi: 10.1890/09-1532.1.
6
Trophic cascade driven by behavioral fine-tuning as naïve prey rapidly adjust to a novel predator.由于天真的猎物迅速适应新的捕食者,行为微调驱动的营养级联反应。
Ecology. 2021 Jul;102(7):e03363. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
7
Life at the top: Lake ecotype influences the foraging pattern, metabolic costs and life history of an apex fish predator.顶级生物的生活:湖生型影响顶级掠食性鱼类的觅食模式、代谢成本和生活史。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 May;88(5):702-716. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12956. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Examining predator-prey body size, trophic level and body mass across marine and terrestrial mammals.研究海洋和陆地哺乳动物的捕食者与猎物的体型、营养级和体重。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 22;281(1797). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2103.
9
Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.恐惧会引发恐惧吗?风险介导的栖息地选择会在较低营养级触发捕食者回避行为。
Oecologia. 2017 Sep;185(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3909-1. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
10
Mammal predator and prey species richness are strongly linked at macroscales.哺乳动物捕食者和猎物的物种丰富度在宏观尺度上有很强的联系。
Ecology. 2013 May;94(5):1112-22. doi: 10.1890/12-1342.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Grouping behaviour and activity patterns of impala () in a nutrient -rich and a nutrient-poor savanna in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚营养丰富和营养贫瘠的稀树草原上黑斑羚( )的群居行为及活动模式
Heliyon. 2022 May 9;8(5):e09386. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09386. eCollection 2022 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Fear and stressing in predator-prey ecology: considering the twin stressors of predators and people on mammals.捕食者 - 猎物生态学中的恐惧与压力:考量捕食者和人类对哺乳动物的双重压力源
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 30;8:e9104. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9104. eCollection 2020.
2
Nightly selection of resting sites and group behavior reveal antipredator strategies in giraffe.夜间休息地点的选择和群体行为揭示了长颈鹿的反捕食策略。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 14;10(6):2917-2927. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6106. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation.
推断哺乳动物树:用于生态学、进化和保护问题的物种级系统发育集合。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Dec 4;17(12):e3000494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Fear of the dark? Contrasting impacts of humans versus lynx on diel activity of roe deer across Europe.怕黑吗?人类和猞猁对整个欧洲马鹿昼夜活动的影响大不相同。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):132-145. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13161. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
Fear of humans as apex predators has landscape-scale impacts from mountain lions to mice.人类作为顶级掠食者的恐惧对从美洲狮到老鼠等生物产生了具有景观尺度的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2019 Oct;22(10):1578-1586. doi: 10.1111/ele.13344. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
Sleep patterns, daytime predation, and the evolution of diurnal sleep site selection in lorisiforms.灵长目昼行性动物的睡眠模式、日间捕食行为与昼间睡眠地点选择的进化。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018 Jul;166(3):563-577. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23450.
7
The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality.人类干扰对野生动物夜间活动的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 15;360(6394):1232-1235. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7121.
8
Fitness consequences of fish circadian behavioural variation in exploited marine environments.在被开发利用的海洋环境中鱼类昼夜行为变化对健康状况的影响
PeerJ. 2018 May 18;6:e4814. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4814. eCollection 2018.
9
Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis.危险的时间变化驱动反捕食行为:捕食风险分配假说。
Am Nat. 1999 Jun;153(6):649-659. doi: 10.1086/303202.
10
Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour.危险的时期和危险的地方相互作用,影响猎物的行为。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1123-1128. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0220-9. Epub 2017 Jun 26.