• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非对冲击波碎石术后肾结石清除率的影响:一项开放标签、随机、前瞻性研究。

Effect of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil on renal calculus clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: An open-labelled, randomised, prospective study.

作者信息

Neeli Siddalingeshwar

机构信息

Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, India.

出版信息

Asian J Urol. 2021 Oct;8(4):430-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2021.03.005
PMID:34765451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8566347/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil in achieving clearance of fragments after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) to treat renal calculi.

METHODS

Between January 2016 to December 2017, 140 patients with solitary, non-branched, non-lower calyceal renal calculus and measuring less than 20 mm and treated with SWL were randomized to tamsulosin (group A) or tamsulosin plus tadalafil (group B). Therapy was given for a period of 4 weeks. Stone clearance rate, analgesic requirement, occurrence of steinstrasse, need for auxiliary procedures (endoscopic treatment), and adverse effects of drugs were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall clearance rate was 72.5% (50/69) in the group A and 90.1% (64/71) in the group B (=0.007). For stones up to 12 mm, the difference in the clearance rate was significant (=0.039) while it was not so for stones larger than 12 mm (=0.151). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regards to analgesic requirement (=0.94), occurrence of steinstrasse (=0.101), need for auxiliary procedures (=0.76), and adverse effects of the drugs (=0.148).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that adjunctive medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin and tadalafil achieves better clearance rate than tadalafil alone in patients receiving SWL for renal stones.

摘要

目的

比较坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非在冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗肾结石后实现碎片清除的疗效。

方法

2016年1月至2017年12月期间,140例接受SWL治疗的孤立性、非分支、非下盏肾结石患者,结石直径小于20mm,被随机分为坦索罗辛组(A组)或坦索罗辛联合他达拉非组(B组)。治疗为期4周。记录结石清除率、镇痛需求、石街发生率、辅助程序(内镜治疗)需求及药物不良反应。

结果

A组总体清除率为72.5%(50/69),B组为90.1%(64/71)(P=0.007)。对于直径达12mm的结石,清除率差异有统计学意义(P=0.039),而对于直径大于12mm的结石则无显著差异(P=0.151)。两组在镇痛需求(P=0.94)、石街发生率(P=0.101)、辅助程序需求(P=0.76)及药物不良反应(P=0.148)方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,在接受SWL治疗肾结石的患者中,坦索罗辛联合他达拉非的辅助药物排石疗法比单用他达拉非能实现更好的清除率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/405a/8566347/99a3ccc2de13/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/405a/8566347/99a3ccc2de13/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/405a/8566347/99a3ccc2de13/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil on renal calculus clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: An open-labelled, randomised, prospective study.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非对冲击波碎石术后肾结石清除率的影响:一项开放标签、随机、前瞻性研究。
Asian J Urol. 2021 Oct;8(4):430-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?坦索罗辛在肾和输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术中是否有作用?
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.160.
3
Is low-dose tadalafil better than tamsulosin? A randomized controlled trial in shockwave lithotripsy for solitary upper tract calculi.低剂量他达拉非是否比坦索罗辛更好?一项针对孤立性上尿路结石冲击波碎石术的随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2023 Sep;132(3):314-320. doi: 10.1111/bju.16038. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
Tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非作为输尿管下段结石药物排石治疗的随机对照试验
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1012-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12496. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy on stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石患者排石效果的比较:一项随机、双盲的临床试验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):982-988. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1007.
6
Effects and outcome of Tamsulosin more than just stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi.坦索罗辛对肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后的影响及结果:不仅仅是结石清除
J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Jun;64(6):644-8.
7
Tamsulosin and doxazosin as adjunctive therapy following shock-wave lithotripsy of renal calculi: randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛和多沙唑嗪作为肾结石冲击波碎石术后的辅助治疗:随机对照试验
Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0410-x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛联合体外冲击波碎石术促进肾和输尿管结石排出的疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):692-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K546. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Is Tamsulosin Effective after Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones? A Randomized, Controlled Study.坦索罗辛在儿童肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后是否有效?一项随机对照研究。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 2):1284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
10
Comparative efficacy of tadalafil versus tamsulosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a prospective randomized trial.他达拉非与坦索罗辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):178-82. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.766. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief.他达拉非联合坦索罗辛治疗对缓解输尿管支架相关症状的疗效。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):111-116. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.66. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A network meta-analysis on the beneficial effect of medical expulsive therapy after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.一项关于体外冲击波碎石术后医疗排石疗法有益效果的网状荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14862-3.
2
Efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Mar;58(2):82-89. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.82. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
The efficacy of tamsulosin vs. nifedipine for the medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones: A randomised clinical trial.
坦索罗辛与硝苯地平用于远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
4
Silodosin versus tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a prospective randomized study.对比西洛多辛与坦索罗辛用于远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗的前瞻性随机研究。
Urologia. 2015 Jan-Mar;82(1):54-7. doi: 10.5301/uro.5000083. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
5
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin with tadalafil in combination with prednisolone for the medical expulsive therapy of lower ureteric stones: a randomized trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非并加用泼尼松龙用于下段输尿管结石药物排石治疗的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Korean J Urol. 2014 Mar;55(3):196-200. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.3.196. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
6
The evolving epidemiology of stone disease.结石病不断演变的流行病学。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):44-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124206.
7
The efficacy of tamsulosin in lower ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。
Urol Ann. 2010 May;2(2):63-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.65110.
8
Does tamsulosin increase stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy of renal stones? A prospective, randomized controlled study.坦索罗辛能否增加肾结石冲击波碎石术后的结石清除率?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010 Feb;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.3109/00365590903359916.
9
alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.α受体阻滞剂辅助体外冲击波碎石术后排石:一项荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09014.x. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
10
Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛联合体外冲击波碎石术促进肾和输尿管结石排出的疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):692-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K546. Epub 2008 Apr 15.