• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诉诸认知吝啬鬼:使用需求回避调节提示和自愿任务转换中的认知灵活性。

Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1329-1347. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000942.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000942
PMID:34766818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8597921/
Abstract

Current cognitive control accounts view goal-directed behavior as striking a balance between two antagonistic control demands: Stability, on the one hand, reflects a rigid, focused state of control and flexibility, while on the other, reflects a relaxed, distractible state, whereby goals can be rapidly updated to meet unexpected changes in demands. In the current study, we sought to test whether the avoidance of cognitive demand could motivate people to dynamically regulate control along the stability-flexibility continuum. In both cued (Experiment 1) and voluntary (Experiment 2) task-switching paradigms, we selectively associated either task-switches or task-repetitions with high cognitive demand (independent of task identity), and measured changes in performance in a following phase after the demand manipulation was removed. Contrasting performance with a control group, across both experiments, we found that selectively associating cognitive demand with task repetitions increased flexibility, but selectively associating cognitive demand with task switches failed to increase stability. The results of the current study provide novel evidence for avoidance-driven modulations of control regulation along the stability-flexibility continuum, while also highlighting some limitations in using task-switching paradigms to examine motivational influences on control adaptation. Data, analysis code, experiment code, and preprint available at osf.io/7rct9/. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当前的认知控制理论认为,目标导向行为是在两种对立的控制需求之间取得平衡的结果:一方面,稳定性反映了一种僵化、专注的控制状态,而灵活性则反映了一种放松、易分散注意力的状态,从而可以快速更新目标以适应需求的意外变化。在当前的研究中,我们试图测试避免认知需求是否会促使人们沿着稳定性-灵活性连续体动态地调节控制。在提示(实验 1)和自愿(实验 2)任务转换范式中,我们选择性地将任务转换或任务重复与高认知需求相关联(与任务身份无关),并在需求操作消除后测量后续阶段的性能变化。与对照组进行对比实验 1 和实验 2 的结果均表明,选择性地将认知需求与任务重复相关联会增加灵活性,但选择性地将认知需求与任务转换相关联并不能提高稳定性。本研究的结果为避免认知需求驱动的控制调节沿着稳定性-灵活性连续体提供了新的证据,同时也强调了使用任务转换范式来研究控制适应的动机影响的一些局限性。数据、分析代码、实验代码和预印本可在 osf.io/7rct9/ 上获取。

相似文献

1
Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.诉诸认知吝啬鬼:使用需求回避调节提示和自愿任务转换中的认知灵活性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1329-1347. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000942.
2
No need to choose: Independent regulation of cognitive stability and flexibility challenges the stability-flexibility trade-off.无需取舍:认知稳定性和灵活性的独立调节挑战了稳定性-灵活性权衡。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3009-3027. doi: 10.1037/xge0001241. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Control dilemma: Evidence of the stability-flexibility trade-off.控制困境:稳定性-灵活性权衡的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2023 Sep;191:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Contextual control demands determine whether stability and flexibility trade off against each other.语境控制需求决定了稳定性和灵活性是否相互权衡。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2529-2551. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02955-x. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
6
Flexibility by association? No evidence for an influence of cue-transition associations on voluntary task switching.通过联想实现灵活性?线索转换联想对自愿任务转换没有影响的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Mar;50(3):313-328. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001186.
7
Learning where to be flexible: Using environmental cues to regulate cognitive control.学习如何灵活应变:利用环境线索调节认知控制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Feb;153(2):328-338. doi: 10.1037/xge0001488. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
8
Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration.奖励前景增加促进认知灵活性:来自双重登记自愿任务转换的直接证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1926-1944. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819449. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
9
Contextual adaptation of cognitive flexibility in kindergartners and fourth graders.幼儿园儿童和四年级学生认知灵活性的情境适应性
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Mar;227:105586. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105586. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
Electrophysiological evidence for preparatory reconfiguration before voluntary task switches but not cued task switches.自愿任务切换而非提示任务切换前准备性重新配置的电生理证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):454-61. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0499-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The benefit of choice on task performance: Reduced difficulty effects in free-choice versus forced-choice tasks.选择对任务表现的益处:自由选择任务与强制选择任务中难度效应的降低
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1162-1177. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01641-5. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
The influence of reward and loss outcomes after free- and forced-tasks on voluntary task choice.自由任务和强制任务后的奖励和损失结果对自愿任务选择的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2059-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02009-9. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
The temporal dynamics of task processing and choice in a novel multitasking paradigm.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention need not always apply: Mind wandering impedes explicit but not implicit sequence learning.注意不一定总是适用:心流阻碍了显式但不阻碍内隐序列学习。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104530. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104530. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Contextual recruitment of selective attention can be updated via changes in task relevance.选择性注意的情境性招募可以通过任务相关性的变化进行更新。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2021 Mar;75(1):19-34. doi: 10.1037/cep0000221. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.
在一种新颖的多重任务范式中任务处理和选择的时间动态。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1737-1757. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01971-8. Epub 2024 May 11.
4
Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.通过任务集的并发激活来学习准备状态:来自任务特异性和记忆负荷的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1510-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01560-5. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
Reactive and proactive control processes in voluntary task choice.自愿任务选择中的反应性和主动性控制过程。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):417-429. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01470-y. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
The Role of Effector-Specific Task Representations in Voluntary Task Switching.效应器特定任务表征在自愿任务切换中的作用。
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 13;6(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.255. eCollection 2023.
情境适应性认知灵活性是由任务和项目水平的学习驱动的。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug;20(4):757-782. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9.
4
Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training.增强任务需求会破坏学习,但会增强短期任务转换训练中的迁移收益。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1473-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
How sequential changes in reward expectation modulate cognitive control: Pupillometry as a tool to monitor dynamic changes in reward expectation.奖励预期的顺序变化如何调节认知控制:瞳孔测量作为监测奖励预期动态变化的工具。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Feb;148:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior.将任务选择与任务表现联系起来:内部和可预测的外部处理约束共同影响自愿任务转换行为。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Dec;45(12):1529-1548. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000690. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility.掌握认知灵活性。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):470-476. doi: 10.1177/0963721418787475. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration.奖励前景增加促进认知灵活性:来自双重登记自愿任务转换的直接证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1926-1944. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819449. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
9
Memory-guided selective attention: Single experiences with conflict have long-lasting effects on cognitive control.记忆引导的选择性注意:单次冲突体验对认知控制具有持久影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1134-1153. doi: 10.1037/xge0000431. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task switching training.少即是多:短期任务转换训练中不同的内容和结构与固定的内容和结构的成本与收益。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1531-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7. Epub 2018 Apr 5.