• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制

Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.

作者信息

Egner Tobias, Siqi-Liu Audrey

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University.

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, George Washington University.

出版信息

Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342
PMID:38186744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10769152/
Abstract

Cognitive flexibility denotes the ability to disengage from a current task and shift one's focus to a different activity. An individual's level of flexibility is not fixed; rather, people adapt their readiness to switch tasks to changing circumstances. We here review recent studies in the task-switching literature that have produced new insights into the contextual factors that drive this adaptation of flexibility, as well as proposals regarding the underlying cognitive mechanisms and learning processes. A fast-growing literature suggests that there are several different means of learning the need for, and implementing, changes in one's level of flexibility. These, in turn, have distinct consequences for the degree to which adjustments in cognitive flexibility are transferrable to new stimuli and tasks.

摘要

认知灵活性指的是从当前任务中脱离出来并将注意力转移到不同活动上的能力。个体的灵活性水平并非固定不变;相反,人们会根据不断变化的环境来调整自己切换任务的准备状态。我们在此回顾任务切换文献中的近期研究,这些研究对驱动这种灵活性适应的情境因素产生了新的见解,同时也提出了关于潜在认知机制和学习过程的建议。快速增长的文献表明,有几种不同的方式来学习灵活性水平变化的必要性并加以实施。反过来,这些方式对于认知灵活性调整能够转移到新刺激和任务上的程度有着不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.情境适应性认知灵活性是由任务和项目水平的学习驱动的。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug;20(4):757-782. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9.
3
Learning Cognitive Flexibility: Neural Substrates of Adapting Switch-Readiness to Time-varying Demands.学习认知灵活性:适应时变需求的转换准备状态的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Feb 1;36(2):377-393. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02091.
4
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
Primed to be inflexible: the influence of set size on cognitive flexibility during childhood.准备好变得不灵活:设定大小对儿童认知灵活性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 12;5:101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00101. eCollection 2014.
7
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.巩固对习得的转换准备影响最小。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1622-1637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001074. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.神经动力学视角下认知灵活性的情境敏感性调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;34(3):480-494. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01813.
9
Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.认知灵活性:睡眠剥夺导致表现障碍的一个独特因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
How Sequentially Changing Reward Prospect Modulates Meta-control: Increasing Reward Prospect Promotes Cognitive Flexibility.奖励前景的顺序变化如何调节元控制:增加奖励前景促进认知灵活性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):534-548. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00825-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroadaptive changes in brain structural-functional coupling among pilots.飞行员大脑结构-功能耦合中的神经适应性变化。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jul 24;19:1608739. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1608739. eCollection 2025.
2
Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.任务切换与跨任务干扰控制的建模支持了认知稳定性与灵活性的二维模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02712-7.
3
Neurobiology and Cognition in Girls at High-Risk of Eating Disorders: Exploring Imaging-Derived Trait Markers.

本文引用的文献

1
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
On the normative advantages of dopamine and striatal opponency for learning and choice.
饮食失调高风险女孩的神经生物学与认知:探索影像衍生的特质标记物
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2025 Sep;33(5):1032-1043. doi: 10.1002/erv.3203. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
4
Implicit manifestation of prospective metacognition in betting choices enhances its efficiency compared to explicit expression.与明确表达相比,前瞻性元认知在博彩选择中的隐性表现提高了其效率。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 5;19:1490530. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1490530. eCollection 2025.
5
Development of a nomogram model for predicting dementia risk in the older adult population of Weifang, Shandong Province, China: based on the biopsychosocial model.基于生物心理社会模型的山东省潍坊市老年人群痴呆风险预测列线图模型的构建
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;13:1499820. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1499820. eCollection 2025.
6
Jumping to Conclusions: Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty.草率下结论:不确定性决策中认知控制的机制
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 17;15(2):226. doi: 10.3390/bs15020226.
7
Contextual control demands determine whether stability and flexibility trade off against each other.语境控制需求决定了稳定性和灵活性是否相互权衡。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2529-2551. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02955-x. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
Measuring cognitive flexibility: A brief review of neuropsychological, self-report, and neuroscientific approaches.测量认知灵活性:神经心理学、自我报告及神经科学方法的简要综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 19;18:1331960. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1331960. eCollection 2024.
多巴胺和纹状体拮抗作用在学习和选择中的规范优势。
Elife. 2023 Mar 22;12:e85107. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85107.
4
The effect of age on task switching: updated and extended meta-analyses.年龄对任务转换的影响:更新和扩展的元分析。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2011-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01794-z. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Transfer of Learned Cognitive Flexibility to Novel Stimuli and Task Sets.习得认知灵活性向新刺激和任务集的转移。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):435-454. doi: 10.1177/09567976221141854. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.评估一次性刺激控制绑定的持久性。
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.218. eCollection 2022.
7
No need to choose: Independent regulation of cognitive stability and flexibility challenges the stability-flexibility trade-off.无需取舍:认知稳定性和灵活性的独立调节挑战了稳定性-灵活性权衡。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3009-3027. doi: 10.1037/xge0001241. Epub 2022 May 26.
8
Distinct but correlated latent factors support the regulation of learned conflict-control and task-switching.不同但相关的潜在因素支持学习冲突控制和任务转换的调节。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Jun;135:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101474. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
9
Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.保持灵活性——持续切换?强制任务切换对自愿任务切换影响的边界条件。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Sep;48(9):1249-1262. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001104. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.诉诸认知吝啬鬼:使用需求回避调节提示和自愿任务转换中的认知灵活性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1329-1347. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000942.