Suppr超能文献

美国急性心肌梗死并发心脏骤停的管理及预后的地域差异和时间趋势

Geographic variation and temporal trends in management and outcomes of cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction in the United States.

作者信息

Atreya Auras R, Patlolla Sri Harsha, Devireddy Chandan M, Jaber Wissam A, Rab S Tanveer, Nicholson William J, Douglas John S, King Spencer B, Vallabhajosyula Saraschandra

机构信息

Institute of Cardiac Sciences and Research, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited studies have evaluated regional disparities in the care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiac arrest (CA). This study sought to evaluate 18-year national trends, resource utilization, and geographical variation in outcomes in AMI-CA admissions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017), we identified adults with AMI and concomitant CA admitted to the United States census regions of Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Clinical outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mechanical circulatory support (MCS), hospitalization costs and length of stay. Of 9,680,257 admissions for AMI, 494,083 (5.1%) had concomitant CA. The West (6.0%) had higher prevalence compared to the Northeast (4.4%), Midwest (5.0%), and South (5.1%), p < 0.001. Admissions in the West had higher rates of STEMI, cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis. Northeast admissions had lower use of coronary angiography (52.0% vs. 67.9% vs. 60.9% vs. 61.5%), PCI (38.7% vs. 51.9% vs. 44.8% vs. 46.7%), and MCS (18.4% vs. 21.8% vs. 18.1%, vs. 20.0%) compared to the Midwest, West and South (all p < 0.001). Compared with the Northeast, adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the Midwest (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.03-1.08]), South (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.09-1.13]) and highest in the West (OR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13-1.18]), all p < 0.001. Temporal trends showed a decline in in-hospital mortality except in the West, which showed a slight increase.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain significant regional disparities in the management and outcomes of AMI-CA.

摘要

背景

针对合并心脏骤停(CA)的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者护理方面的地区差异,相关研究有限。本研究旨在评估18年来全国范围内AMI-CA入院患者的趋势、资源利用情况及结局的地理差异。

方法与结果

利用全国住院患者样本(2000 - 2017年),我们确定了美国东北部、中西部、南部和西部人口普查区域内合并CA的AMI成年患者。关注的临床结局包括住院死亡率、冠状动脉造影的使用、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、机械循环支持(MCS)、住院费用和住院时间。在9,680,257例AMI入院患者中,494,083例(5.1%)合并CA。与东北部(4.4%)、中西部(5.0%)和南部(5.1%)相比,西部(6.0%)的患病率更高,p < 0.001。西部的入院患者中STEMI、心源性休克、多器官衰竭、机械通气和血液透析的发生率更高。与中西部、西部和南部相比,东北部的冠状动脉造影使用率较低(52.0%对67.9%对60.9%对61.5%),PCI使用率较低(38.7%对51.9%对44.8%对46.7%),MCS使用率较低(18.4%对21.8%对18.1%对20.0%)(所有p < 0.001)。与东北部相比,中西部调整后的住院死亡率更高(比值比[OR] 1.06 [95%置信区间{CI} 1.03 - 1.08]),南部(OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.09 - 1.13]),西部最高(OR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13 - 1.18]),所有p < 0.001。时间趋势显示,除西部略有上升外,住院死亡率呈下降趋势。

结论

AMI-CA的管理和结局仍存在显著的地区差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验