• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似围手术期过敏的早期和晚期检测的可靠性。

Reliability of Early and Late Testing for Suspected Perioperative Hypersensitivity.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology, Allergology, and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Paediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology, Allergology, and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Apr;10(4):1057-1062.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.066. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.066
PMID:34767998
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of diagnostic testing for perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) remains unknown. It has been recommended that investigation is best carried out at least 4 to 6 weeks after the event. On the other hand, guidelines discourage the use of in vitro tests later than 3 years after the index reaction.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to assess the reliability of early and late skin tests (STs). It also attempted to verify whether discouraging late ex vivo and in vitro tests is substantiated.

METHODS

For the first aim, patients were stratified over three epochs: an early timing group, with investigations performed within 6 weeks; a recommended timing group, with tests performed between 6 weeks and 6 months; and a late timing group, tested later than 6 months after the event. For the second study purpose, we studied the reliability of specific IgE quantification and basophil activation test rocuronium within 6 weeks and after 3 years in patients who experienced an ST-proven POH to rocuronium.

RESULTS

A total of 677 patients were included. Based on a positive ST result, a causative agent was found in 74.2% of the early timing group, 62.6% of the recommended timing group, and 50% of the late timing group. A positive specific IgE for rocuronium or morphine was found in 80% of patients tested within 6 weeks, 63% of patients tested between 6 weeks and 3 years, and 50% of patients tested more than 3 years after the event. A positive basophil activation test was found in 83.3%, 51%, and 20%, respectively, of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that evaluation of drug allergy for suspected POH can be performed before 6 weeks after the event, and there is no maximal upper time limit disclosing ex vivo and in vitro testing.

摘要

背景

围手术期过敏反应(POH)的诊断检测最佳时机仍不清楚。据建议,在事件发生后至少 4 至 6 周进行调查最为合适。另一方面,指南不鼓励在索引反应后 3 年内使用体外检测。

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估早期和晚期皮肤试验(ST)的可靠性。它还试图验证是否有理由不鼓励晚期体外和体内检测。

方法

为了实现第一个目标,患者分为三个时期:早期时间组,在 6 周内进行检查;推荐时间组,在 6 周至 6 个月之间进行检查;晚期时间组,在事件发生后 6 个月后进行检查。为了实现第二个研究目的,我们研究了在 ST 证实对罗库溴铵发生 POH 的患者中,在 6 周内和 3 年后进行特异性 IgE 定量和嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验罗库溴铵的可靠性。

结果

共纳入 677 例患者。根据阳性 ST 结果,在早期时间组、推荐时间组和晚期时间组中,分别有 74.2%、62.6%和 50%的患者找到了病因。在 6 周内接受检测的患者中,80%的患者发现了对罗库溴铵或吗啡的特异性 IgE,63%的患者在 6 周至 3 年内接受了检测,50%的患者在事件发生 3 年后接受了检测。嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验阳性率分别为 83.3%、51%和 20%。

结论

我们的数据证实,在事件发生后 6 周内可以对疑似 POH 的药物过敏进行评估,并且没有发现体外和体内检测的最大上限时间。

相似文献

1
Reliability of Early and Late Testing for Suspected Perioperative Hypersensitivity.疑似围手术期过敏的早期和晚期检测的可靠性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Apr;10(4):1057-1062.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.066. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Comparison of the passive mast cell activation test with the basophil activation test for diagnosis of perioperative rocuronium hypersensitivity.用于围手术期罗库溴铵超敏反应诊断的被动肥大细胞激活试验与嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;132(3):483-490. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.033. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Rocuronium Hypersensitivity: Does Off-Target Occupation of the MRGPRX2 Receptor Play a Role?罗库溴铵过敏:MRGPRX2 受体的非靶标占据是否起作用?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):998-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Predictive value of allergy tests for neuromuscular blocking agents: tackling an unmet need.神经肌肉阻滞剂过敏试验的预测价值:满足未被满足的需求
Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Aug;44(8):1069-75. doi: 10.1111/cea.12344.
5
Allergy to rocuronium: from clinical suspicion to correct diagnosis.罗库溴铵过敏:从临床怀疑到正确诊断。
Allergy. 2011 Aug;66(8):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02569.x. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
6
Perioperative anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: Crucial role of in-vitro testing.围手术期对洗必泰的过敏反应:体外检测的关键作用。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2024 Mar;42(1):74-76. doi: 10.12932/AP-250620-0890.
7
Flow-assisted diagnostic management of anaphylaxis from rocuronium bromide.罗库溴铵所致过敏反应的血流动力学辅助诊断管理
Allergy. 2006 Aug;61(8):935-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01094.x.
8
Application of specific-to-total IgE ratio does not benefit diagnostic performance of serologic testing for rocuronium allergy.特异性与总IgE比值的应用对罗库溴铵过敏血清学检测的诊断性能并无益处。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;125(6):e443-e446. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Perioperative hypersensitivity in children: A prospective multidisciplinary study.儿童围手术期超敏反应:一项前瞻性多学科研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Mar;68(3):321-327. doi: 10.1111/aas.14354. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
Acute Management, Diagnosis, and Follow-Up of Suspected Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Flanders 2001-2018.2001-2018 年弗拉芒地区疑似围手术期过敏反应的急性处理、诊断和随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2194-2204.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and Treatment of Perioperative Allergic Complications: A Practical Review.围手术期过敏并发症的诊断与治疗:实用综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 15;12(4):e5734. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005734. eCollection 2024 Apr.