University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111097.
Workplace interventions that leverage social tactics to improve health and well-being are becoming more common. As an example, peer mental health support interventions aim to reduce stigma and promote treatment seeking in first responder populations. Given the social nature of these interventions, it is important to consider how the preexisting social context influences intervention outcomes. A peer mental health support intervention was delivered among first responders, and self-efficacy and intention to have supportive peer conversations were measured pre-and post-intervention. Trust in peers was measured prior to the intervention. Results suggest a floor effect may exist for self-efficacy, in which a foundational level of trust and pre-intervention self-efficacy may be needed to maximize intervention effectiveness. As the future of work brings complex safety and health challenges, collaborative solutions that engage multiple stakeholders (employees, their peers, and their organization) will be needed. This study suggests that more frequent attention to pre-existing intervention context, particularly social context in peer-focused intervention, will enhance intervention outcomes.
利用社交策略来改善健康和幸福感的工作场所干预措施越来越普遍。例如,同伴心理健康支持干预旨在减少急救人员群体中的污名化现象并促进他们寻求治疗。鉴于这些干预措施的社会性,重要的是要考虑预先存在的社会环境如何影响干预结果。在急救人员中实施了同伴心理健康支持干预措施,并在干预前后测量了自我效能感和与支持性同伴交谈的意愿。在干预之前测量了对同伴的信任。结果表明,自我效能感可能存在下限效应,即需要一定的基础信任和干预前的自我效能感,才能最大限度地提高干预效果。随着未来工作带来复杂的安全和健康挑战,将需要采用合作解决方案来吸引多个利益相关者(员工、他们的同事和他们的组织)。本研究表明,更频繁地关注预先存在的干预背景,特别是同伴为重点的干预中的社会背景,将提高干预效果。