Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Center for Healthcare Architecture (CVA), Division of Building Design, Department Architecture and Civil Engineering (ACE), Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Goteborg, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 31;18(21):11478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111478.
Healthcare facilities are facing huge challenges due to the outbreak of COVID-19. Around the world, national healthcare contingency plans have struggled to cope with the population health impact of COVID-19, with healthcare facilities and critical care systems buckling under the extraordinary pressures. COVID-19 has starkly highlighted the lack of reliable operational tools for assessing the level sof flexibility of a hospital building to support strategic and agile decision making. The aim of this study was to modify, improve and test an existing assessment tool for evaluating hospital facilities flexibility and resilience. We followed a five-step process for collecting data by (i) doing a literature review about flexibility principles and strategies, (ii) reviewing healthcare design guidelines, (iii) examining international healthcare facilities case studies, (iv) conducting a critical review and optimization of the existing tool, and (v) assessing the usability of the evaluation tool. The new version of the OFAT framework (Optimized Flexibility Assessment Tool) is composed of nine evaluation parameters and subdivided into measurable variables with scores ranging from 0 to 10. The pilot testing of case studies enabled the assessment and verification the OFAT validity and reliability in support of decision makers in addressing flexibility of hospital design and/or operations. Healthcare buildings need to be designed and built based on principles of flexibility to accommodate current healthcare operations, adapting to time-sensitive physical transformations and responding to contemporary and future public health emergencies.
医疗机构正面临着因 COVID-19 爆发带来的巨大挑战。在世界各地,国家医疗应急计划难以应对 COVID-19 对人口健康造成的影响,医疗机构和重症监护系统承受着巨大的压力。COVID-19 突出表明,缺乏可靠的运营工具来评估医院建筑的灵活性水平,以支持战略性和敏捷性决策。本研究旨在改进和测试现有的评估医院设施灵活性和弹性的评估工具。我们通过以下五个步骤来收集数据:(i)对灵活性原则和策略进行文献回顾,(ii)审查医疗保健设计指南,(iii)研究国际医疗设施案例研究,(iv)对现有工具进行批判性审查和优化,以及(v)评估评估工具的可用性。新版本的 OFAT 框架(优化灵活性评估工具)由九个评估参数组成,并细分为可衡量的变量,其得分范围为 0 到 10。对案例研究的试点测试实现了 OFAT 的有效性和可靠性评估,为决策者应对医院设计和/或运营的灵活性提供支持。医疗保健建筑需要基于灵活性原则进行设计和建造,以适应当前的医疗保健运营,适应对时间敏感的物理转换,并应对当前和未来的公共卫生紧急情况。