• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者个人支持网络的变化:性别差异及其对健康的影响(CUIDAR-SE 研究)。

Changes in Caregiver Personal Support Networks: Gender Differences and Effects on Health (CUIDAR-SE Study).

机构信息

Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria de Andalucía Oriental (FIBAO), 18012 Granada, Spain.

Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), 18080 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;18(21):11723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111723.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111723
PMID:34770237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583071/
Abstract

Technological changes have led to important advances in medical diagnoses and treatments that prolong the informal care process. Support from the personal network of informal caregivers is an undervalued resource and the changes that have occurred over time are unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the changes in personal network support among informal caregivers and to examine the effect of these changes on self-perceived caregiver health, with a focus on differences between men and women and caregivers with high and low levels of burden We also investigated caregiver perceptions and explanations of changes to their support network (losses and additions and no change). Using a mixed-methods approach, data were obtained from 32 caregivers that were intentionally selected in Spain, who were interviewed twice with a one-year interval. In the quantitative phase, personal networks analysis was performed with Egonet software, which obtained data on the composition and functional content in social support from 1600 personal relationships (25 alters for each ego in the two waves). In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted in the two waves with a guide in order to explore the changes in informal support resources over time. The selected men with high levels of burden pointed out a loss of network support with more discouraging reports compared with the low-burden male caregivers. Furthermore, the selected women with low burden levels mentioned losses too; however, their reports were more positive. Women reported improved health, especially those with low burden scores in the first wave and those who did not lose support. Caregivers with a high initial burden and who lost support reported worse health, particularly men and women with a strong sense of duty toward care. Social support from personal networks is important for caregiver health and its effects are influenced by gender roles. Our findings could help by improving the relational and social capital of informal caregivers and adapting them to the new needs of formal home care systems.

摘要

技术变革推动了医学诊断和治疗的重要进步,延长了非正规护理过程。非正式照顾者的个人网络支持是一种被低估的资源,而且随着时间的推移,这种资源发生了变化,但人们对此并不了解。本研究旨在分析非正式照顾者个人网络支持的变化,并探讨这些变化对自我感知照顾者健康的影响,重点关注男女之间以及负担高低不同的照顾者之间的差异。我们还调查了照顾者对其支持网络变化(损失、增加和无变化)的看法和解释。本研究采用混合方法,从西班牙有目的地选择了 32 名照顾者,他们在一年的时间间隔内进行了两次访谈。在定量阶段,使用 Egonet 软件进行个人网络分析,该软件从 1600 个个人关系中获取了社会支持的组成和功能内容(两次波次中每个自我有 25 个改变者)。在定性阶段,两次波次均进行了半结构化访谈,采访指南旨在探讨随着时间的推移非正式支持资源的变化。选择的高负担男性照顾者指出网络支持的损失,与低负担男性照顾者相比,他们的报告更令人沮丧。此外,选择的低负担女性照顾者也提到了损失,但她们的报告更为积极。女性报告了健康状况的改善,尤其是那些在第一次波次负担水平低且没有失去支持的女性。那些初始负担高且失去支持的照顾者报告了更差的健康状况,尤其是那些责任感强的男性和女性照顾者。个人网络的社会支持对照顾者的健康很重要,其影响受到性别角色的影响。我们的研究结果可以通过提高非正式照顾者的关系和社会资本,并使其适应新的家庭护理系统的需求来提供帮助。

相似文献

1
Changes in Caregiver Personal Support Networks: Gender Differences and Effects on Health (CUIDAR-SE Study).照顾者个人支持网络的变化:性别差异及其对健康的影响(CUIDAR-SE 研究)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;18(21):11723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111723.
2
[Personal support networks and informal care: differences by sex and place? (CUIDAR-SE II study)].[个人支持网络与非正式照料:性别和地域差异?(关爱自我II研究)]
Gac Sanit. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):515-524. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
Determinants of Burden and Satisfaction in Informal Caregivers: Two Sides of the Same Coin? The CUIDAR-SE Study.非专业照护者负担和满意度的决定因素:同一枚硬币的两面?CUIDAR-SE 研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 9;16(22):4378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224378.
4
Gender Differences in Social Support Received by Informal Caregivers: A Personal Network Analysis Approach.《非正式照护者所获得的社会支持中的性别差异:一种个人网络分析方法》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 31;16(1):91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010091.
5
Gender Inequalities of Health and Quality of Life in Informal Caregivers in Spain: Protocol for the Longitudinal and Multicenter CUIDAR-SE Study.《西班牙非正规照护者健康和生活质量的性别不平等:CUIDAR-SE 研究的纵向和多中心方案》。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 2;13:e58440. doi: 10.2196/58440.
6
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Caregiver burden assessed in dementia care networks in Germany: findings from the DemNet-D study baseline.德国痴呆症护理网络中评估的照料负担:DemNet-D研究基线的结果
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Sep;21(9):926-937. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1181713. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Health, Work, and Social Problems in Spanish Informal Caregivers: Does Gender Matter? (The CUIDAR-SE Study).西班牙非正规照护者的健康、工作和社会问题:性别重要吗?(CUIDAR-SE 研究)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147332.
9
The Effect of Support From Secondary Caregiver Network on Primary Caregiver Burden: Do Men and Women, Blacks and Whites Differ?二级照顾者网络支持对主要照顾者负担的影响:男性和女性、黑人和白人有区别吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Oct 6;77(10):1947-1958. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac067.
10
Caregiving and Caregiver Health 1 Year into the COVID-19 Pandemic (CUIDAR-SE Study): A Gender Analysis.新冠肺炎大流行 1 年后的照护者和照护者健康(CUIDAR-SE 研究):一项性别分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031653.

引用本文的文献

1
Curae de Mim (Care for Me): A Personalized Alzheimer's Care Nursing Intervention for Informal Caregivers.关爱自我:针对非正式照料者的个性化阿尔茨海默病护理干预措施
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 25;15(7):270. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070270.
2
Defining informal caregivers by their characteristics safety roles and training needs in Europe.根据欧洲地区非正式护理人员的特征、安全角色及培训需求对其进行界定。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08540-y.
3
Unmet needs and emotional well-being of family caregivers of adult patients with cancer in Oman: a cross-sectional study.阿曼成年癌症患者家庭照顾者未满足的需求及情绪健康状况:一项横断面研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 21;33(7):606. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09680-7.
4
Masculinity in Caregiving: Impact on Quality of Life and Self-Stigma in Caregivers of People with Multiple Sclerosis.照护中的男性气质:对多发性硬化症患者照料者生活质量和自我污名化的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 30;13(3):272. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030272.

本文引用的文献

1
Structuring unequal relations: role trajectories in informal dementia care.构建不平等关系:非正式痴呆症护理中的角色轨迹。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jan;43(1):65-81. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13194. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Satisfaction with Social Support Received from Social Relationships in Cases of Chronic Pain: The Influence of Personal Network Characteristics in Terms of Structure, Composition and Functional Content.慢性疼痛患者从社会关系中获得的社会支持的满意度:个人网络特征(结构、组成和功能内容)的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082706.
3
Burden and Gender inequalities around Informal Care.非正规照料中的负担与性别不平等
Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Feb;38(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v38n1e10.
4
Reciprocity, Autonomy, and Vulnerability in Men's Experiences of Informal Cancer Care.男性在非正式癌症护理中的互惠、自主和脆弱性体验
Qual Health Res. 2020 Mar;30(4):491-503. doi: 10.1177/1049732319855962. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Male Caregivers: Shifting Roles Among Family Caregivers.男性照顾者:家庭照顾者角色的转变
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb 1;23(1):E17-E24. doi: 10.1188/19.CJON.E17-E24.
6
Gender Differences in Social Support Received by Informal Caregivers: A Personal Network Analysis Approach.《非正式照护者所获得的社会支持中的性别差异:一种个人网络分析方法》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 31;16(1):91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010091.
7
Personal Network Analysis in the Study of Social Support: The Case of Chronic Pain.个人网络分析在社会支持研究中的应用:以慢性疼痛为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;15(12):2695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122695.
8
Informal Caregiving and Network Turnover Among Older Adults.老年人的非正式护理和网络更替。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Aug 13;75(7):1538-1547. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby139.
9
Why Name Generators with a Fixed Number of Alters may be a Pragmatic Option for Personal Network Analysis.为什么具有固定数量变体的名称生成器可能是个人网络分析的实用选择。
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;62(1-2):233-238. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12271. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
'Who Cares?' The experiences of caregivers of adults living with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease: a mixed methods systematic review.“谁在乎呢?” 成年心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和冠状动脉疾病患者照顾者的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 11;8(7):e020927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020927.