University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;21(21):7096. doi: 10.3390/s21217096.
The purpose of this study was to compare two wearable sensors to each other and to a questionnaire in an adult population. For one week, participants aged 29.2 ± 5.5 years ( = 25) simultaneously wore a Clouclip, a spectacle-mounted device that records viewing distance and illuminance, and an Actiwatch, a wrist-worn device that measures illuminance and activity. Participants maintained a daily log of activities and completed an activity questionnaire. Objective measures of time outdoors, near (10-< 60 cm) and intermediate (60-100 cm) viewing, and sleep duration were assessed with respect to the daily log and questionnaire. Findings showed that time outdoors per day from the questionnaire (3.2 ± 0.3 h) was significantly greater than the Clouclip (0.9 ± 0.8 h) and Actiwatch (0.7 ± 0.1 h, < 0.001 for both). Illuminance from the Actiwatch was systematically lower than the Clouclip. Daily near viewing duration was similar between the questionnaire (5.7 ± 0.6 h) and Clouclip (6.1 ± 0.4 h, = 0.76), while duration of intermediate viewing was significantly different between methods ( < 0.001). In conclusion, self-reported time outdoors and viewing behaviors were different than objective measures. The Actiwatch and Clouclip are valuable tools for studying temporal patterns of behavioral factors such as near work, light exposure, and sleep.
本研究旨在比较两种可穿戴传感器,并在成人人群中与问卷进行比较。在一周内,年龄为 29.2±5.5 岁(n=25)的参与者同时佩戴 Clouclip 和 Actiwatch。Clouclip 是一种眼镜式设备,可记录视距和照度;Actiwatch 是一种腕戴式设备,可测量照度和活动。参与者每天记录活动并完成活动问卷。根据日常记录和问卷评估户外活动时间、近距离(10-<60cm)和中距离(60-100cm)观察以及睡眠时间。研究结果表明,来自问卷的每日户外活动时间(3.2±0.3h)明显大于 Clouclip(0.9±0.8h)和 Actiwatch(0.7±0.1h,均<0.001)。Actiwatch 的照度明显低于 Clouclip。问卷(5.7±0.6h)和 Clouclip(6.1±0.4h, = 0.76)之间的每日近距离观察时间相似,而两种方法之间的中距离观察时间差异显著(<0.001)。总之,自我报告的户外活动时间和观察行为与客观测量结果不同。Actiwatch 和 Clouclip 是研究行为因素(如近距离工作、光照暴露和睡眠)时间模式的有价值工具。