Suppr超能文献

规范咿呀学语比率 - 0.15标准的同步和预测性评估

Canonical babbling ratio - Concurrent and predictive evaluation of the 0.15 criterion.

作者信息

Nyman Anna, Strömbergsson Sofia, Lohmander Anette

机构信息

Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Habilitation and Health, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2021 Nov-Dec;94:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106164. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Canonical babbling ratio (CBR) is a commonly used measure to quantify canonical babbling (CB), and 0.15 is the commonly accepted criterion for the canonical babbling stage. However, this has not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of this criterion using concurrent and predictive comparisons.

METHODS

Longitudinal data from 50 children recruited in different clinical projects were used. At 10 months of age, CBR was calculated based on counted utterances from audio-video recorded parent-child interactions. The videos were also assessed by CB observation, where an observer made an overall judgement on whether the child was in the canonical babbling stage or not. For the concurrent evaluation, CBR was compared to CB observation as a reference test, using area under the curve (AUC). The criterion resulting in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was identified using positive likelihood ratios. In the predictive comparisons CBR was analyzed as a predictor of speech/language difficulties at 30-36 months. Participants presenting with difficulties in consonant production and/or parent-reported vocabulary were considered to have speech/language difficulties. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for CBR using the 0.15 criterion and the new criterion identified in this study.

RESULTS

An AUC of 0.87 indicated that CBR is a valid measure of canonical babbling in 10-month-old children. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was found at a criterion of 0.14 (sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.70). In the predictive comparison, CBR with a 0.14 or 0.15 criterion revealed the same sensitivity (0.71) but 0.14 showed a slightly better specificity (0.52 versus 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

CBR is a valid measure of CB (at 10 months). However, when using CBR to classify children's babbling as canonical or non-canonical, researchers need to carefully consider the implications of the chosen criterion.

摘要

引言

规范咿呀语比率(CBR)是一种常用的量化规范咿呀语(CB)的指标,0.15是规范咿呀语阶段普遍接受的标准。然而,这一点尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是通过同时性和预测性比较来评估该标准的有效性。

方法

使用了从不同临床项目招募的50名儿童的纵向数据。在10个月大时,根据对亲子互动音频视频记录中的发声计数来计算CBR。这些视频还通过CB观察进行评估,由一名观察者对儿童是否处于规范咿呀语阶段做出总体判断。在同时性评估中,将CBR与CB观察作为参考测试进行比较,使用曲线下面积(AUC)。使用阳性似然比确定导致敏感性和特异性最佳组合的标准。在预测性比较中,将CBR作为30至36个月时言语/语言困难的预测指标进行分析。在辅音发音和/或家长报告的词汇方面存在困难的参与者被视为有言语/语言困难。使用0.15标准和本研究确定的新标准对CBR的敏感性和特异性进行比较。

结果

AUC为0.87表明CBR是10个月大儿童规范咿呀语的有效指标。在0.14的标准下发现了敏感性和特异性的最佳组合(敏感性0.96,特异性0.70)。在预测性比较中,标准为0.14或0.15的CBR显示出相同的敏感性(0.71),但0.14的特异性略好(分别为0.52和0.42)。

结论

CBR是CB(10个月时)的有效指标。然而,当使用CBR将儿童的咿呀语分类为规范或非规范时,研究人员需要仔细考虑所选标准的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验