Suppr超能文献

美罗培南在伴有或不伴有烧伤的危重症患者中的药代动力学,这些患者接受或未接受连续静脉-静脉血液滤过治疗。

Meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with or without burn treated with or without continuous veno-venous haemofiltration.

机构信息

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Experimental Therapeutics, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Clinical Research Support Division, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, TX, United States.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2156-2168. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15138. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Severe burn injury involves widespread skin and tissue damage leading to systemic inflammation, hypermetabolism and multi-organ failure. The hypermetabolic phase of burn injury has been associated with increased systemic antibiotic clearance; however, critical illness in the absence of burn may also induce similar physiologic changes. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often implemented in critically ill patients and may also affect antibiotic clearance. Although the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem has been described in both the burn and non-burn critically ill populations, direct comparative data is lacking.

METHODS

For this study, we evaluated PK parameters of meropenem from 23 critically ill patients, burn or non-burn, treated with or without continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) to determine the contribution of burn and CVVH to the variability of therapeutic meropenem levels.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model best described the data and revealed creatinine clearance (CrCl) and total burn surface area (TBSA) as significant covariates on clearance (CL) and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp), respectively. Of interest, non-burn patients on CVVH displayed an overall lower inherent CL as compared to burn patients on CVVH (6.43 vs. 12.85 L/h). Probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations revealed augmented renal clearance (ARC) may necessitate dose adjustments, but TBSA and CVVH would not.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a standard dose of 1000 mg every 8 hours; however, if ARC is suspected, or the severity of illness requires a more stringent therapeutic target, we recommend a loading dose of 1000-2000 mg infused over 30 minutes to 1 hour followed by continuous infusion (3000-6000 mg over 24 hours), or intermittent infusion of 2000 mg every 8 hours.

摘要

简介

严重烧伤涉及广泛的皮肤和组织损伤,导致全身炎症、高代谢和多器官衰竭。烧伤后高代谢期与全身性抗生素清除率增加有关;然而,没有烧伤的危重病也可能引起类似的生理变化。连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)常用于危重病患者,也可能影响抗生素清除率。虽然美罗培南的药代动力学(PK)在烧伤和非烧伤危重患者中都有描述,但缺乏直接比较的数据。

方法

在这项研究中,我们评估了 23 名接受或不接受连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)治疗的烧伤或非烧伤危重患者的美罗培南 PK 参数,以确定烧伤和 CVVH 对治疗性美罗培南水平变异性的贡献。

结果

两室模型最能描述数据,并显示肌酐清除率(CrCl)和总烧伤表面积(TBSA)分别是清除率(CL)和外周分布容积(Vp)的重要协变量。有趣的是,接受 CVVH 的非烧伤患者的固有 CL 总体上低于接受 CVVH 的烧伤患者(6.43 与 12.85 L/h)。概率目标达标(PTA)模拟显示,增强的肾清除率(ARC)可能需要调整剂量,但 TBSA 和 CVVH 则不需要。

结论

我们建议标准剂量为每 8 小时 1000 毫克;然而,如果怀疑存在 ARC,或者疾病的严重程度需要更严格的治疗目标,我们建议在 30 分钟至 1 小时内输注 1000-2000 毫克的负荷剂量,然后持续输注(24 小时内输注 3000-6000 毫克),或每 8 小时间歇性输注 2000 毫克。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/9299819/fef5b20b64a4/BCP-88-2156-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验