• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在媒体报道阿斯利康疫苗致命副作用前后对医疗服务的利用:一项全国范围内基于登记的事件研究。

Utilization of health care services before and after media attention about fatal side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine: a nation-wide register-based event study.

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Cluster for Health Services Research, Postboks 222, Skøyen, N-0213, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07233-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07233-2
PMID:34774045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8590367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survey studies have found that vaccinated persons tend to report more side effects after being given information about side effects rather than benefits. However, the impact of high media attention about vaccine-related side effects on the utilization of health care is unknown. We aimed to assess whether utilization of health care services for newly vaccinated health care workers changed after media attention about fatal side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine on March 11th, 2021, and whether changes differed by age, sex, or occupation.

METHODS

We utilized individual-level data on health care use, vaccination, employment, and demographics available in the Norwegian emergency preparedness register Beredt C19. In all 99,899 health care workers in Norway who were vaccinated with AstraZeneca between February 11th and March 11th, we used an event-study design with a matched comparison group to compare the change in primary and inpatient specialist care use from 14 days before to 14 days after the information shock on March 11th, 2021.

RESULTS

Primary health care use increased with 8.2 daily consultations per 1000 health care workers (95% CI 7.51 to 8.89) the week following March 11th for those vaccinated with AstraZeneca (n = 99,899), compared with no increase for the unvaccinated comparison group (n = 186,885). Utilization of inpatient care also increased with 0.8 daily hospitalizations per 1000 health care workers (95% CI 0.37 to 1.23) in week two after March 11th. The sharpest increase in daily primary health care use in the first week after March 11th was found for women aged 18-44 (10.6 consultations per 1000, 95% CI 9.52 to 11.68) and for cleaners working in the health care sector (9.8 consultations per 1000, 95% CI 3.41 to 16.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Health care use was higher after the media reports of a few cases of fatal or severe side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Our results suggest that the reports did not only lead vaccinated individuals to contact primary health care more, but also that physicians referred and treated more cases to specialist care after the new information.

摘要

背景

调查研究发现,在接种者获得有关副作用的信息后,他们往往会报告更多的副作用。然而,关于媒体对与疫苗相关的副作用的高度关注对医疗保健的利用的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估在 2021 年 3 月 11 日媒体报道阿斯利康疫苗致命副作用后,新接种疫苗的卫生保健工作者对医疗服务的利用是否发生变化,以及这种变化是否因年龄、性别或职业而异。

方法

我们利用挪威应急准备登记处 Beredt C19 中可获得的关于医疗保健使用、疫苗接种、就业和人口统计学的个人水平数据。在挪威所有于 2021 年 2 月 11 日至 3 月 11 日之间接种阿斯利康疫苗的 99899 名卫生保健工作者中,我们使用事件研究设计,使用匹配的对照组,比较了 3 月 11 日信息冲击前 14 天和后 14 天的初级和住院专科医疗保健使用变化。

结果

与未接种疫苗的对照组(n=186885)相比,对于接种阿斯利康疫苗的人(n=99899),在 3 月 11 日之后的一周内,初级保健的使用增加了 8.2 次/每 1000 名卫生保健工作者的每日就诊(95%CI 7.51 至 8.89),而未接种疫苗的对照组则没有增加。在 3 月 11 日后的第二周,住院治疗的利用率也增加了 0.8 次/每 1000 名卫生保健工作者的每日住院治疗(95%CI 0.37 至 1.23)。在 3 月 11 日后的第一周内,每日初级保健使用率的急剧上升发生在 18-44 岁的女性(10.6 次就诊/每 1000 人,95%CI 9.52 至 11.68)和在医疗保健部门工作的清洁工(9.8 次就诊/每 1000 人,95%CI 3.41 至 16.19)。

结论

在媒体报道阿斯利康疫苗少数几例致命或严重副作用后,医疗保健的使用增加了。我们的结果表明,这些报道不仅导致接种者更多地接触初级保健,而且还导致医生在获得新信息后将更多病例转诊和治疗至专科保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/30d88f5d75ed/12913_2021_7233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/b3fa1e92a9b3/12913_2021_7233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/97f2897c94df/12913_2021_7233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/c4c04a7d403d/12913_2021_7233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/30d88f5d75ed/12913_2021_7233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/b3fa1e92a9b3/12913_2021_7233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/97f2897c94df/12913_2021_7233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/c4c04a7d403d/12913_2021_7233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/8590367/30d88f5d75ed/12913_2021_7233_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of health care services before and after media attention about fatal side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine: a nation-wide register-based event study.在媒体报道阿斯利康疫苗致命副作用前后对医疗服务的利用:一项全国范围内基于登记的事件研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07233-2.
2
Side effects after COVID-19 vaccinations among residents of Poland.波兰居民接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的副作用。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jun;25(12):4418-4421. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202106_26153.
3
Recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program. Supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).在事件前疫苗接种计划中使用天花疫苗的建议。免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)和医疗保健感染控制实践咨询委员会(HICPAC)的补充建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Apr 4;52(RR-7):1-16.
4
Has vaccination alleviated the strain on hospitals due to COVID-19? A combined difference-in-difference and simulation approach.疫苗接种是否减轻了 COVID-19 给医院带来的压力?一种差分法和模拟法的结合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08541-x.
5
A public health perspective on the responsibility of mass media for the outcome of the anti-COVID-19 vaccination campaign: the AstraZeneca case.从公共卫生角度看大众媒体对新冠疫苗接种运动结果的责任:阿斯利康案例。
Ann Ig. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(6):650-655. doi: 10.7416/ai.2022.2499. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Side Effects and Perceptions Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Jordan: A Randomized, Cross-Sectional Study Implementing Machine Learning for Predicting Severity of Side Effects.约旦新冠疫苗接种后的副作用及认知:一项采用机器学习预测副作用严重程度的随机横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 26;9(6):556. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060556.
7
Safety and tolerability of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines among people with epilepsy (PwE): A cross-sectional study.新型 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗在癫痫患者(PwE)中的安全性和耐受性:一项横断面研究。
Seizure. 2021 Nov;92:2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
Sustained COVID-19 vaccine willingness after safety concerns over the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.对牛津-阿斯利康疫苗的安全性担忧后,对 COVID-19 疫苗的持续意愿。
Dan Med J. 2021 Mar 31;68(5):A03210292.
9
Assessment of Communication Strategies for Mitigating COVID-19 Vaccine-Specific Hesitancy in Canada.评估加拿大减轻 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫相关沟通策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126635. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26635.
10
Quantifying healthcare and welfare sector workers' preferences around COVID-19 vaccination: a cross-sectional, single-profile discrete-choice experiment in France.量化医疗和福利部门工作人员对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的偏好:法国的一项横断面、单剖面离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 4;11(10):e055148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055148.

引用本文的文献

1
Does timing matter? The role of health information shocks in measuring willingness to pay.时机重要吗?健康信息冲击在衡量支付意愿中的作用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01774-7.
2
Analysis of Thromboembolic and Thrombocytopenic Events After the AZD1222, BNT162b2, and MRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in 3 Nordic Countries.在 3 个北欧国家分析 AZD1222、BNT162b2 和 mRNA-1273 新冠疫苗接种后的血栓栓塞和血小板减少事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17375.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and bleeding episodes: Large population-based cohort study.腺病毒载体新冠疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)接种与出血事件的关联:基于大人群的队列研究。
Vaccine. 2021 Sep 24;39(40):5854-5857. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.055. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
Birds of a feather flock together: Comparing controlled pre-post designs.物以类聚,人以群分:比较对照前后测设计。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):942-952. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13697. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Arterial events, venous thromboembolism, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding after vaccination with Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S in Denmark and Norway: population based cohort study.
丹麦和挪威接种牛津-阿斯利康 ChAdOx1-S 后动脉事件、静脉血栓栓塞、血小板减少和出血:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 May 5;373:n1114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1114.
4
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination.接种 ChAdOx1 nCov-19 疫苗后发生血栓性血小板减少症。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination.ChAdOx1新冠疫苗接种后的血栓形成和血小板减少症
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2124-2130. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104882. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Covid-19: European countries suspend use of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots.新冠疫情:有报道称出现血栓后,欧洲多国暂停使用牛津-阿斯利康疫苗。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 11;372:n699. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n699.
7
SARS-CoV-2 in health and care staff in Norway, 2020.2020 年挪威卫生保健人员中的 SARS-CoV-2 情况。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2021 Feb 9;141(3). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.1048. Print 2021 Feb 23.
8
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.评估医疗保健政策变化的方法:双重差分法
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.
10
Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: the case of influenza immunization.框架效应在期望、决策及所经历的副作用方面的体现:以流感疫苗接种为例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1271-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00177-1.