Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2021 Dec;15(5):279-290. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
The recent evidence suggested substantial anxiolytic efficacy of lavender. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of lavender for anxiety, depression, and physiological parameters and to elucidate the differential effects of lavender on anxiety and depression by study characteristics.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of lavender on anxiety, depression, or physiological parameters in humans. We assessed the risk of bias within studies with the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. We used random effect model to estimate the average effect and computed bias-corrected standardized mean difference as effect size metric, Hedges' ĝ for all outcomes.
Lavender was superior to placebo or no treatment in reducing anxiety (Hedges' ĝ = -0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.90 to -0.55, p value <.001), depression (Hedges' ĝ = -0.43, 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.27, p value <.001), and systolic blood pressure (Hedges' ĝ = -0.23, 95% CI, -0.41to -0.05, p value = .01). The moderator analysis by meta-regression indicated that route of administration accounted 6.5% (p value = .187) for the heterogeneity in anxiolytic effects, sessions of treatment accounted 13.2% (p value = .055), and participants' health state accounted 8.9% (p value = .131) for the variance in anxiolytic effects.
Lavender aromatherapy showed substantial effect in reducing anxiety and depression, and sessions of administration increased the anxiolytic effects. The effects on physiological parameters showed small with inconsistent significances and randomized controlled trials on the effect of lavender on depression were scarce. Future trials on depression and physiological parameters are recommended, and increasing the sessions of administration is recommended.
最近的证据表明薰衣草具有显著的抗焦虑作用。本研究旨在考察薰衣草治疗焦虑、抑郁和生理参数的疗效,并通过研究特征阐明薰衣草对焦虑和抑郁的不同作用。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature 数据库,以调查薰衣草治疗人类焦虑、抑郁或生理参数的疗效的随机对照试验。我们使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具评估了研究内的偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型估计平均效应,并计算了偏倚校正后的标准化均数差值作为效应量指标,所有结局均使用 Hedges' ĝ。
与安慰剂或无治疗相比,薰衣草在降低焦虑(Hedges' ĝ = -0.72,95%置信区间 [CI] -0.90 至 -0.55,p 值 <.001)、抑郁(Hedges' ĝ = -0.43,95% CI,-0.59 至 -0.27,p 值 <.001)和收缩压(Hedges' ĝ = -0.23,95% CI,-0.41 至 -0.05,p 值 =.01)方面均具有优势。通过荟萃回归的调节分析表明,给药途径占抗焦虑作用异质性的 6.5%(p 值 =.187),治疗疗程占 13.2%(p 值 =.055),参与者的健康状况占抗焦虑作用变异性的 8.9%(p 值 =.131)。
薰衣草芳香疗法在降低焦虑和抑郁方面显示出显著的效果,且增加治疗疗程可增强抗焦虑效果。对生理参数的影响较小,且意义不一致,且关于薰衣草对抑郁影响的随机对照试验较少。建议进行关于抑郁和生理参数的试验,并建议增加治疗疗程。