Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense. CIBERES. Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias. Madrid, Spain.
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2022 Apr;35(2):105-114. doi: 10.37201/req/149.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
Several health organizations, mainly in Western countries, have recently authorized the use of a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine for patients previously vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, with criteria that do not always coincide. The COVID Scientific Committee of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid (ICOMEM) has received and asked several questions about this situation, to which the group has tried to give answers, after deliberation and consensus. The efficacy of the vaccines administered so far is beyond doubt and they have managed to reduce, fundamentally, the severe forms of the disease. The duration of this protection is not well known, is different in different individuals and for different variants of the virus and is not easily predictable with laboratory tests. Data on the real impact of a supplementary or "booster" dose in the scientific literature are scarce for the moment and its application in large populations such as those in the state of Israel may be associated with a decrease in the risk of new and severe episodes in the short observation period available. We also lack sufficient data on the safety and potential adverse effects of these supplementary doses and we do not know the ideal time to administer them in different situations. In this state of affairs, it seems prudent to administer supplemental doses to those exposed to a higher risk, such as immunocompromised individuals and the elderly. On the other hand, we consider that this is not the time to accelerate, on the spur of the moment, a massive administration of a third dose to other population groups that are less exposed and at lower risk, without waiting for adequate scientific information, which will undoubtedly arrive gradually. We do not believe that this position is incompatible with the practical and ethical warnings made by the World Health Organization in this respect.
一些卫生组织,主要在西方国家,最近授权对先前接种过 mRNA 疫苗的患者使用 COVID-19 疫苗加强针,其标准并不总是一致的。马德里杰出医师学院(ICOMEM)的 COVID 科学委员会收到并询问了有关这种情况的几个问题,经过审议和协商,该小组试图给出答案。迄今为止,已接种疫苗的功效是毋庸置疑的,它们基本上已经成功降低了疾病的严重程度。这种保护的持续时间尚不清楚,在不同个体和不同病毒变体之间是不同的,并且用实验室测试不易预测。目前,关于补充剂或“加强剂”剂量在科学文献中的实际影响的数据还很有限,其在以色列等国家的大量人群中的应用可能与在可获得的短期观察期内新的和严重发作风险降低有关。我们还缺乏关于这些补充剂量的安全性和潜在不良影响的足够数据,也不知道在不同情况下最佳的给药时间。在这种情况下,似乎明智的做法是对那些面临更高风险的人群(如免疫功能低下者和老年人)进行补充剂量的接种。另一方面,我们认为,现在还不是在没有足够科学信息的情况下,仓促地为其他暴露风险较低的人群加速接种第三剂疫苗的时候。我们不认为这种立场与世界卫生组织在这方面的实际和伦理警告不一致。