Brigham Young University, Department of Exercise Sciences, USA.
Brigham Young University, Department of Dance, USA.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
To determine if positional release therapy (PRT) or therapeutic massage (TM) was more effective in the treatment of trigger and tender points in the upper trapezius muscle.
Trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle are common and can be painful. Trigger points are commonly treated using TM however, PRT is a novel treatment that deserves further investigation.
Sixty healthy male (24) and female (36) participants, (age = 27.1 ± 8.8 years, wt = 75.2 ± 17.9 kg, ht = 172.8 ± 9.7 cm) presenting with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point were recruited and randomized into either the TM or PRT group. Upper trapezius trigger points were found via palpation. Pain level was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) was assessed using a pressure algometer. Muscle thickness was measured by B-mode ultrasound, while muscle stiffness was measured by shear-wave elastography (SWE). Participants were measured at baseline, posttreatment and again 48 h later.
Both treatments were effective in treatment of pain and muscle stiffness. Although no statistical group differences existed, treatment using PRT showed decreased pain averages and decreased pressure sensitivity at both post treatment, and 48 h later. Neither treatment was able to maintain the reduced muscle stiffness at the 48-h measure in males.
Both treatments showed a significant ability to reduce pain and acutely decrease muscle stiffness. Although not statistically different, clinically PRT is more effective at decreasing pain, and decreasing pressure sensitivity. Neither treatment method produced a long lasting effect on muscle stiffness in males.
确定位置释放疗法(PRT)或治疗性按摩(TM)在治疗上斜方肌触发点和痛点方面更有效。
上斜方肌的触发点很常见,而且可能会很痛。触发点通常使用 TM 治疗,但 PRT 是一种新的治疗方法,值得进一步研究。
招募了 60 名健康的男性(24 名)和女性(36 名)参与者(年龄=27.1±8.8 岁,体重=75.2±17.9kg,身高=172.8±9.7cm),他们患有上斜方肌疼痛和触发点,并随机分为 TM 或 PRT 组。通过触诊找到上斜方肌触发点。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛程度,使用压力测痛计评估疼痛压力阈值(PPT)。使用 B 型超声测量肌肉厚度,使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量肌肉硬度。在基线、治疗后和 48 小时后对参与者进行测量。
两种治疗方法都能有效治疗疼痛和肌肉僵硬。虽然组间没有统计学差异,但 PRT 治疗在治疗后和 48 小时后疼痛平均值和压力敏感度降低。两种治疗方法都不能在男性中维持 48 小时时的肌肉僵硬降低。
两种治疗方法都能显著减轻疼痛,并能在急性时降低肌肉僵硬。虽然没有统计学差异,但临床上 PRT 在降低疼痛和降低压力敏感度方面更有效。两种治疗方法都不能在男性中产生持久的肌肉僵硬效果。