Sadria Golnaz, Hosseini Majid, Rezasoltani Asghar, Akbarzadeh Bagheban Alireza, Davari Ahmadreza, Seifolahi Afsaneh
Rehabilitation Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rehabilitation Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Oct;21(4):920-925. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The increasing use of computer in daily life has brought about numerous musculoskeletal problems. Impairments in the head, neck and shoulders are more common compared with the other parts of the body. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two manual treatments in two separate groups, i.e., active release technique (ART) and muscle energy technique (MET) on the latent trigger points (LTrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle. The set criteria in the study included the active range of cervical lateral flexion, pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS), and the upper trapezius muscle thickness.
This clinical trial study assessed the outcome measures within and between groups before and after the intervention. The target population were 64 (32 males, 32 females) participants who had been selected from among the staff members and the students of a rehabilitation school, and the employees of an engineering company who had LTrPs in their upper trapezius muscle and were from 18 to 50 years old.
The immediate effects of MET and ART on the patients of each groups with LTrPs in their upper trapezius muscle were increased active range of cervical lateral flexion (P < 0.001), decreased pain intensity on VAS (P < 0.05) and decreased thickness of the upper trapezius muscle (P < 0.01).
Both manual techniques of ART and MET reduced the symptoms of LTrPs in the upper trapezius in the two groups equally, neither technique being superior to the other.
背景/目的:计算机在日常生活中的使用日益增加,引发了众多肌肉骨骼问题。与身体其他部位相比,头、颈和肩部的损伤更为常见。本研究的目的是比较两种手法治疗,即主动放松技术(ART)和肌肉能量技术(MET),对两组上斜方肌潜在触发点(LTrP)的影响。该研究设定的标准包括颈椎侧屈的活动范围、视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的疼痛强度以及上斜方肌的厚度。
这项临床试验研究评估了干预前后组内和组间的结果指标。目标人群为64名(32名男性,32名女性)参与者,他们是从一所康复学校的教职员工和学生以及一家工程公司的员工中挑选出来的,年龄在18至50岁之间,且上斜方肌有LTrP。
MET和ART对上斜方肌有LTrP的每组患者的即时影响包括颈椎侧屈活动范围增加(P < 0.001)、VAS上的疼痛强度降低(P < 0.05)以及上斜方肌厚度减小(P < 0.01)。
ART和MET这两种手法技术在两组中同等程度地减轻了上斜方肌LTrP的症状,两种技术均不优于另一种。