Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Silivri Anadolu Special Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Aug;28(6):785-788. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
Winograd procedures performed under a partial digital block with a single needle to the surgical side instead of the entire toe were not evaluated. This study aimed to examine the clinical results of classic ring block and partial digital block performed during Winograd procedures in cases of ingrown toenails.
A total of 210 patients underwent Winograd surgery were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia used as follows: traditional ring block (TRB) and partial digital block (PDB). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Heifetz stage patient satisfaction levels, recurrence rates, and need for reoperation were recorded.
Compared with the PDB group, the during operation VAS score was statistically significantly higher in the TRB group (p = 0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative satisfaction, recurrence (p = 0294), and reoperation rates (p = 0651).
This study is the first to show that adequate anesthetic efficacy can be achieved with a less invasive intervention for Winograd procedures.
尚未评估在部分数字阻滞下,用一根针单侧进针而不是整个足趾进针进行的 Winograd 手术。本研究旨在研究经典环阻滞和部分数字阻滞在嵌甲手术中应用于 Winograd 手术的临床效果。
共有 210 例患者接受了 Winograd 手术,根据所用麻醉类型分为两组,如下:传统环阻滞(TRB)和部分数字阻滞(PDB)。记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Heifetz 阶段患者满意度、复发率和再次手术需要。
与 PDB 组相比,TRB 组术中 VAS 评分显著更高(p=0.0001)。两组在术后满意度、复发率(p=0.294)和再次手术率(p=0.651)方面无统计学差异。
本研究首次表明,Winograd 手术可以通过微创干预获得足够的麻醉效果。