Suppr超能文献

评估脊髓灰质炎补充免疫活动对常规免疫和卫生系统的影响:系统评价。

Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication.

METHODS

We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded.

RESULTS

20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised.

CONCLUSION

Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020152195.

摘要

简介

全球根除脊髓灰质炎行动(GPEI)利用脊髓灰质炎补充免疫活动(SIA)作为增加疫苗覆盖率和停止脊髓灰质炎病毒传播的策略。SIA 对免疫系统的影响经常引发争议。我们回顾了在脊髓灰质炎根除的现代时代,SIA 对常规免疫和卫生系统的影响。

方法

我们在九个数据库中搜索了报告脊髓灰质炎 SIA 和免疫覆盖、财务投资、劳动力和卫生服务提供情况的研究。我们对证据进行了叙述性综合。排除了 1994 年以前的记录、动物、模型或案例研究数据。

结果

20/1637 份独特的记录被纳入。有 70%(14/20)的研究报告了疫苗覆盖率数据,65%(13/20)的研究报告了劳动力数据,85%(17/20)的研究报告了卫生服务提供数据。SIA 对七种疫苗接种的非脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种率的提高有积极影响,三种研究结果为中性,一种为阴性。一些脊髓灰质炎 SIA 通过培训和能力建设为劳动力加强做出了贡献。脊髓灰质炎 SIA 伴随着社会动员和社区意识的增强,增强了对疫苗接种计划的信心。纳入的研究具有计划性质,数据存在差异,因此不能公正地进行批判性评价。

结论

脊髓灰质炎 SIA 成功地提高了脊髓灰质炎疫苗的覆盖率,但资源和基础设施并不总是用于提供非脊髓灰质炎疫苗和纳入常规服务提供。我们发现缺乏评估 SIA 的标准化工具,这可以为服务整合提供信息。我们的研究提供了数据来为 SIA 评估提供信息,并为 COVID-19 疫苗推出提供了重要考虑因素,以加强卫生系统。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020152195。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0c/8593720/65ede08d89a8/bmjgh-2021-006568f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验