Suppr超能文献

术前和术后血清癌胚抗原与肺癌预后的临床关联

Clinical Associations of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum CEA and Lung Cancer Outcome.

作者信息

Jiao Zonglin, Cao Shoubo, Li Jianhua, Hu Nan, Gong Yinghui, Wang Linduo, Jin Shi

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, China.

出版信息

Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Oct 27;8:686313. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.686313. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a classic tumour marker, is widely used in lung cancer in clinical practice. Nevertheless, few studies have elucidated the influence of dynamic changes in CEA in the perioperative phases, as a prognostic indicator, on lung cancer prognosis. This retrospective cohort analysis included consecutive patients with stage I-III lung cancer who underwent curative resection between December 2010 and December 2014. The patients were grouped into three cohorts: group A included patients with normal preoperative CEA, group B included patients with elevated preoperative CEA but normal postoperative CEA, and group C included patients with elevated preoperative and postoperative CEA. Five-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazard regression. A total of 1662 patients with stage I-III lung cancer were enrolled in our study. Patients with normal preoperative CEA had 15.9 and 20.1% better 3- and 5-year OS rates than the cohort with elevated preoperative CEA ( < 0.001). Furthermore, group C had 36.0 and 26.6% lower 5-year OS rates ( = 74, 32.4%) than group A ( = 1188, 68.4%) and group B ( = 139, 59.0%) ( < 0.001). Group B had poorer OS than group A ( = 0.016). For patients with different pathological TNM stages, subgroup analyses showed that group C had the shortest OS in stages I and II ( < 0.05), and patients with a post-preoperative CEA increment had poorer OS than those without an increment ( = 0.029). Multivariate analyses suggested that group C (HR = 2.0, 95% CI, 1.5-2.7, < 0.001) rather than the group with normalized postoperative CEA (HR = 1.2, 95% CI, 0.9-1.5, = 0.270) was an independent prognostic factor. In subgroup analysis of adenocarcinoma (ADC), survival analyses suggested that group C predicted a worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis of ADC indicated that group C was an independent adverse prognostic factor (HR = 1.9, 95% CI, 1.4-2.7, < 0.001). Combined elevated preoperative and postoperative CEA is an independent adverse prognostic factor for stage I-III lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, routine perioperative detection of serum CEA can yield valuable prognostic information for patients after lung cancer surgery.

摘要

血清癌胚抗原(CEA)是一种经典的肿瘤标志物,在肺癌临床实践中被广泛应用。然而,作为一种预后指标,很少有研究阐明围手术期CEA动态变化对肺癌预后的影响。这项回顾性队列分析纳入了2010年12月至2014年12月期间连续接受根治性切除的Ⅰ - Ⅲ期肺癌患者。患者被分为三组:A组包括术前CEA正常的患者,B组包括术前CEA升高但术后CEA正常的患者,C组包括术前和术后CEA均升高的患者。采用Kaplan - Meier分析(对数秩检验)估计5年总生存率(OS)。使用Cox比例风险回归进行多变量分析。本研究共纳入1662例Ⅰ - Ⅲ期肺癌患者。术前CEA正常的患者3年和5年OS率分别比术前CEA升高的队列高15.9%和20.1%(P < 0.001)。此外,C组的5年OS率比A组(n = 118,68.4%)和B组(n = 139,59.0%)分别低36.0%和26.6%(P < 0.001)。B组的OS比A组差(P = 0.016)。对于不同病理TNM分期的患者,亚组分析显示C组在Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期的OS最短(P < 0.05),术前术后CEA升高的患者比未升高的患者OS更差(P = 0.029)。多变量分析表明,C组(HR = 2.0,95%CI,1.5 - 2.7,P < 0.001)而非术后CEA恢复正常的组(HR = 1.2,95%CI,0.9 - 1.5,P = 0.270)是独立的预后因素。在腺癌(ADC)亚组分析中,生存分析表明C组预后较差。ADC的多变量分析表明C组是独立的不良预后因素(HR = 1.9,95%CI,1.4 - 2.7,P < 0.001)。术前和术后CEA均升高是Ⅰ - Ⅲ期肺腺癌独立的不良预后因素。此外,围手术期常规检测血清CEA可为肺癌手术后患者提供有价值的预后信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1404/8578711/54a080485490/fmolb-08-686313-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验