• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生与数字技术互动的综合研究:文献系统综述

Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Nkomo Larian M, Daniel Ben K, Butson Russell J

机构信息

Higher Education Development Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
PMID:34778529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8241468/
Abstract

Restrictions on physical gathering due to COVID-19 has compelled higher education institutions to rapidly embrace digital technologies to support teaching and learning. While logistically, the use of digital technologies offers an obvious solution, attention must be given to these methods' pedagogical appropriateness, mainly how students engage and learn in the spaces supported by these technologies. In this context, we explored the degree to which digital technologies have contributed to teaching and learning practices over the past decade. The study employed a systematic review using a newly developed tripartite model for conducting and presenting literature review reports. The model approaches the literature review process systematically and employs three phases for the critical examination of literature: description, synthesis, and critique. The current review focused on student engagement across technologies that encompass social media, video, and collaborative learning technologies. Relevant articles were obtained from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Three core themes were identified: there was no shared understanding of what constitutes student engagement with learning technologies, there was a lack of explanation concerning the contextual variation and modalities of student engagement across the digital technologies, and self-reporting was the primary method of measuring student engagement, rendering results as perceptual rather than behavioural. We argue that using multiple datasets and different methodological approaches can provide further insights into student engagement with digital technologies. This approach to measuring engagement can substantiate findings and most likely provide additional insights into students' engagement with digital technologies.

摘要

由于新冠疫情对线下聚集的限制,高等教育机构不得不迅速采用数字技术来支持教学。从后勤角度来看,数字技术的使用提供了一个显而易见的解决方案,但必须关注这些方法在教学上的适用性,尤其是学生在这些技术所支持的空间中的参与方式和学习情况。在此背景下,我们探讨了在过去十年中数字技术对教学实践的贡献程度。该研究采用了一种新开发的三方模型进行系统综述,以撰写和展示文献综述报告。该模型系统地处理文献综述过程,并采用三个阶段对文献进行批判性审视:描述、综合和批判。当前的综述聚焦于涵盖社交媒体、视频和协作学习技术在内的各类技术中的学生参与情况。相关文章从Scopus和科学网数据库中获取。确定了三个核心主题:对于什么构成学生对学习技术的参与,没有达成共识;对于数字技术中学生参与的情境差异和方式,缺乏解释;自我报告是衡量学生参与的主要方法,导致结果是基于感知而非行为的。我们认为,使用多个数据集和不同的方法可以进一步深入了解学生对数字技术的参与情况。这种衡量参与度的方法可以证实研究结果,并很可能为学生对数字技术的参与提供更多见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/b6bf653c5e38/41239_2021_270_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/5f8a323b1c5b/41239_2021_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/b9667aea62f1/41239_2021_270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/b6bf653c5e38/41239_2021_270_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/5f8a323b1c5b/41239_2021_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/b9667aea62f1/41239_2021_270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aab0/8241468/b6bf653c5e38/41239_2021_270_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature.学生与数字技术互动的综合研究:文献系统综述
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
2
Revolutionising Anatomy Education: The Current Role of Digital Technologies in Enhancing Anatomy Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students.革新解剖学教育:数字技术在提升本科医学生解剖学学习方面的当前作用。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 18;16(12):e75919. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75919. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students - a systematic literature review.高等教育学生所感知到的教师支持与学生参与度——一项系统的文献综述
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 11;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w.
4
Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间拉丁美洲高等教育中学生的在线学习参与度:一项系统综述
Br J Educ Technol. 2022 May;53(3):593-619. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13190. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
The value of social media use in improving nursing students' engagement: A systematic review.社交媒体在提高护理学生参与度方面的价值:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Oct;64:103455. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103455. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
6
How an Environment of Stress and Social Risk Shapes Student Engagement With Social Media as Potential Digital Learning Platforms: Qualitative Study.压力与社会风险环境如何塑造学生对作为潜在数字学习平台的社交媒体的参与度:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Jul 13;4(2):e10069. doi: 10.2196/10069.
7
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Navigating the digital shift in radiologic technology education: Distance learning and its implications: A narrative literature review.应对放射技术教育中的数字化转变:远程学习及其影响:一篇叙述性文献综述
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2025 Apr 3;56(4):101895. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101895.
10
A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Applications of Digital Technology in Undergraduate Surgical Education.数字技术在本科外科教育中当前应用的系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Jan 11;17(1):e77278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77278. eCollection 2025 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying the technology acceptance model to examine factors influencing chatbot use in HPV prevention education among nursing students.应用技术接受模型来检验影响护理专业学生在人乳头瘤病毒预防教育中使用聊天机器人的因素。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 28;24(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03620-w.
2
Interplay of student characteristics multidimensional engagement and influencing factors in online computer science education.在线计算机科学教育中学生特征、多维度参与度及影响因素的相互作用
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90142-9.
3
The relationship between information literacy and online learning engagement: a moderated mediating model.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Rewatching Class Recordings versus Retrieval Practice as Post-Lecture Learning Strategies.比较复习课堂录像和检索练习作为课后学习策略的效果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7217. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7217.
2
Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis.1997 - 2017年科学网在已发表的研究论文和综述论文中的应用:一项基于内容的选择性、动态、跨领域分析
Scientometrics. 2018;115(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
3
Tweets from the forest: using Twitter to increase student engagement in an undergraduate field biology course.
信息素养与在线学习参与度之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 28;12(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02316-1.
4
Interrelationships among College Students' Perceptions of Smart Classroom Environments, Perceived Usefulness of Mobile Technology, Achievement Emotions, and Cognitive Engagement.大学生对智慧课堂环境的认知、移动技术的感知有用性、成就情绪和认知参与之间的相互关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;14(7):565. doi: 10.3390/bs14070565.
5
Effectiveness of Twitter Threads to Improve Medical Student Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reading-Skills. The TwittUVa-ECG Non-Randomized Pre-Post Study.推特线程对提高医学生心电图(ECG)阅读技能的有效性。TwittUVa-ECG非随机前后对照研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Oct 7;33(6):1359-1369. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01885-x. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
A Meta-synthesis on Technology-Based Learning Among Healthcare Students in Southeast Asia.东南亚医学生基于技术的学习的元综合研究
Med Sci Educ. 2022 May 7;32(3):657-677. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01564-3. eCollection 2022 Jun.
来自森林的推文:利用推特提高本科生野外生物学课程的学生参与度
F1000Res. 2015 Mar 31;4:82. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6272.1. eCollection 2015.
4
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.《系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明》:针对评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的报告规范解释与阐述
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
5
Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.关系很重要:将教师支持与学生参与度和成绩联系起来。
J Sch Health. 2004 Sep;74(7):262-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.