• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右侧额眼区在价值比较中的因果作用。

A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.

机构信息

Departments of Psychology, Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.

Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Elife. 2021 Nov 15;10:e67477. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67477.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.67477
PMID:34779767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8592572/
Abstract

Recent studies have suggested close functional links between overt visual attention and decision making. This suggests that the corresponding mechanisms may interface in brain regions known to be crucial for guiding visual attention - such as the frontal eye field (FEF). Here, we combined brain stimulation, eye tracking, and computational approaches to explore this possibility. We show that inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the right FEF has a causal impact on decision making, reducing the effect of gaze dwell time on choice while also increasing reaction times. We computationally characterize this putative mechanism by using the attentional drift diffusion model (aDDM), which reveals that FEF inhibition reduces the relative discounting of the non-fixated option in the comparison process. Our findings establish an important causal role of the right FEF in choice, elucidate the underlying mechanism, and provide support for one of the key causal hypotheses associated with the aDDM.

摘要

最近的研究表明,明显的视觉注意力和决策之间存在密切的功能联系。这表明相应的机制可能在大脑区域相互作用,这些区域已知对于引导视觉注意力至关重要,例如额眼区(FEF)。在这里,我们结合了脑刺激、眼动追踪和计算方法来探索这种可能性。我们表明,右侧 FEF 的抑制性经颅磁刺激(TMS)对决策有因果影响,减少了注视停留时间对选择的影响,同时也增加了反应时间。我们通过使用注意力漂移扩散模型(aDDM)对这个假设机制进行了计算表征,该模型揭示了 FEF 抑制减少了比较过程中非注视选项的相对折扣。我们的发现确立了右侧 FEF 在选择中的重要因果作用,阐明了潜在的机制,并为与 aDDM 相关的关键因果假设之一提供了支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/2d3addf1721f/elife-67477-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/2777038ce161/elife-67477-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/4546466f20d1/elife-67477-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/95676d1bfd6d/elife-67477-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/3cd628631eb6/elife-67477-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/2d3addf1721f/elife-67477-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/2777038ce161/elife-67477-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/4546466f20d1/elife-67477-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/95676d1bfd6d/elife-67477-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/3cd628631eb6/elife-67477-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/534f/8592572/2d3addf1721f/elife-67477-sa2-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.右侧额眼区在价值比较中的因果作用。
Elife. 2021 Nov 15;10:e67477. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67477.
2
Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation.人类额叶眼区对决策形成不同方面的因果贡献。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 30;10(1):7317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64064-7.
3
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.经 TMS 探究分心物过滤的神经机制及其历史相关调制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591-7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
TMS on right frontal eye fields induces an inflexible focus of attention.经颅磁刺激右侧额眼区可引起注意力的僵化集中。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Feb;24(2):396-402. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs319. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
5
Visual selection and the human frontal eye fields: effects of frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on partial report analyzed by Bundesen's theory of visual attention.视觉选择与人类额眼区:经邦德森视觉注意理论分析的额部经颅磁刺激对部分报告的影响。
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 2;31(44):15904-13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2626-11.2011.
6
Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.额叶眼区控制对侧枕顶叶皮质中α和γ振荡的注意力调制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1638-47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3116-14.2015.
7
Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search.分离人类额眼区和后顶叶皮层对视搜索的贡献。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jun;105(6):2891-6. doi: 10.1152/jn.01149.2009. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
8
Arrhythmic activity in the left frontal eye field facilitates conscious visual perception in humans.左侧额叶眼动区的节律性活动有助于人类的有意识视觉感知。
Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
Right frontal eye field has perceptual and oculomotor functions during optokinetic stimulation and nystagmus.在视动刺激和眼球震颤期间,右侧额眼区具有感知和眼球运动功能。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb 1;123(2):571-586. doi: 10.1152/jn.00468.2019. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
10
Frontal eye field stimulation modulates the balance of salience between target and distractors.额叶眼区刺激可调节目标与干扰物之间的显著性平衡。
Brain Res. 2009 May 13;1270:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.081. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficient numerosity estimation under limited time.有限时间内的高效数字估计
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Mar 7;21(3):e1012790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012790. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Causal phase-dependent control of non-spatial attention in human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层中非空间注意力的因果相位依赖性控制
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;8(4):743-757. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01820-z. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
The parietal cortex has a causal role in ambiguity computations in humans.顶叶皮层在人类的歧义计算中具有因果作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value.视觉注意力调节与目标相关的证据的整合,而不是价值。
Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9:e60705. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60705.
2
Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion: A drift-diffusion decomposition.损失规避的心理机制:漂移-扩散分解。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Dec;123:101331. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101331. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work.多巴胺通过使认知工作的收益与成本产生偏差来促进认知努力。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 10;22(1):e3002452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002452. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Monkeys exhibit human-like gaze biases in economic decisions.猴子在经济决策中表现出类似人类的注视偏见。
Elife. 2023 Jul 27;12:e78205. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78205.
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5891.
4
The formation of preference in risky choice.风险选择中的偏好形成。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 29;15(8):e1007201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007201. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.数量和时间对跨期选择有独立的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Apr;3(4):383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making.凝视会增强决策中的价值。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):116-128. doi: 10.1177/0956797618810521. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
7
The spillover effects of attentional learning on value-based choice.注意学习的溢出效应对基于价值的选择的影响。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
8
Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making.考虑在决策的序列采样模型中的注意力。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
9
The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices.注意力的力量:利用眼动追踪预测他人关注和道德选择。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;29(11):1878-1889. doi: 10.1177/0956797618799301. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Triple dissociation of attention and decision computations across prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮质中注意力和决策计算的三重分离。
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Oct;21(10):1471-1481. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0239-5. Epub 2018 Sep 26.