Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Oct;22(10):481-491. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients' social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these "social care" initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories.
We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D.
目的综述:越来越多的研究文献表明,社会经济状况与健康结果之间存在关联,这促使医疗机构投资于新的活动,以在提供医疗服务的过程中识别和解决患者的社会状况。尽管国家对这些“社会关怀”举措的投资不断增加,但这些社会关怀活动在多大程度上被常规纳入 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的护理中,特别是还不清楚。我们对现有的 T2D 治疗和管理指南进行了范围综述,以探讨这些指南是否以及如何纳入反映社会关怀实践类别的建议。
最新发现:我们应用搜索词在美国从 1977 年到 2021 年期间定位了所有成人 T2D 治疗和管理指南。搜索结果捕获了 158 项国家指南。随后,我们应用国家科学院、工程院和医学研究所的框架,在每个指南中搜索与五项社会关怀活动相关的建议:意识、调整、协助、倡导和协调。大多数指南(122 项;77%)没有推荐任何社会关怀活动。其余(36 项;23%)提到了一种或多种社会关怀活动。在提到至少一种社会关怀活动的指南中,根据社会风险调整医疗治疗的做法最为常见[34/36(94%)]。推荐的调整包括降低药物费用以适应经济压力、改变文化水平或宣传册的语言以及提供虚拟就诊以适应交通不安全。确保实践指南更一致地反映社会关怀的最佳实践,可能会改善 T2D 患者的治疗效果。