• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处方模式的变化:对成本的影响。

Changing prescription patterns: impact on costs.

作者信息

Bock K D

机构信息

Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Universität (GHS) Essen, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Aug;5(3):S83-5.

PMID:3478431
Abstract

The cost of treating hypertension is high. In the Federal Republic of Germany the total sales of antihypertensive compounds increased, from 1981 to 1984, from 1075 million to 1525 million DM per year, corresponding to 7.4 and 9.1%, respectively, of total drug expenditure. Economists have calculated that about two-thirds of this increase is caused by structural changes within the market, i.e. changing prescription patterns. The proportion of prescribed daily doses of reserpine combinations dropped from 52 to 34% whereas that of most other compounds increased. The approximate daily costs of treatment vary from 0.5 DM (reserpine combinations) to 2.5 DM [angiotensin converting enzyme, (ACE) inhibitors], but the decline of the cheaper compounds and their substitution by newer and more expensive drugs has resulted in additional costs of 309-328 million DM. The higher prices of the new drugs should be justified by greater benefits compared with conventional compounds. Assessment of new antihypertensive drugs should include potency, efficacy, number and quality of adverse effects, and impact on quality of life. The evaluation should be performed separately for mild and for more severe forms of hypertension. Some advantages or drawbacks of the newer drugs may be important for small subgroups only.

摘要

治疗高血压的费用高昂。在德意志联邦共和国,抗高血压药物的年销售总额从1981年的1.075亿德国马克增至1984年的1.525亿德国马克,分别占药品总支出的7.4%和9.1%。经济学家计算得出,这一增长中约三分之二是由市场结构变化导致的,即处方模式的改变。利血平复方制剂的每日处方剂量比例从52%降至34%,而大多数其他药物的比例则有所上升。治疗的每日费用大致从0.5德国马克(利血平复方制剂)到2.5德国马克[血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂]不等,但较便宜药物的用量减少以及被更新、更昂贵的药物所替代,导致额外费用达3.09亿至3.28亿德国马克。与传统药物相比,新药更高的价格应当通过更大的疗效来证明其合理性。对新型抗高血压药物的评估应包括效能、疗效、不良反应的数量和质量,以及对生活质量的影响。评估应分别针对轻度和重度高血压进行。某些新药的优点或缺点可能仅对小部分亚组人群具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Changing prescription patterns: impact on costs.处方模式的变化:对成本的影响。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Aug;5(3):S83-5.
2
Antihypertensive drug prescription trends at the primary health care centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心的抗高血压药物处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 May;10(3):219-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.578.
3
Consumption and costs of antihypertensive drugs in Mexico: are diuretic agents a standing technological trajectory?墨西哥抗高血压药物的消费与成本:利尿剂是否构成一条持续的技术轨迹?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Mar;2(1):22-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.10.001.
4
Evaluation of the total cost of treating elderly hypertensive patients with ACE inhibitors: a comparison of older and newer agents.评估使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗老年高血压患者的总成本:新旧药物对比
Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):1011-6.
5
[Use of antihypertensive drugs in Spain (1995-2001)].[西班牙抗高血压药物的使用情况(1995 - 2001年)]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004 Mar;57(3):241-9.
6
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
7
[Treatment of severe arterial hypertension: cost of drug prescriptions in accordance with ANAES guidelines].[重度动脉高血压的治疗:符合ANAES指南的药物处方费用]
Therapie. 2001 Mar-Apr;56(2):111-8.
8
Antihypertensive drug prescribing in Grampian.格兰扁地区的降压药处方情况
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Sep;60(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02414.x.
9
Cost-minimization analysis of initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential diastolic hypertension.轻度至中度原发性舒张期高血压患者初始抗高血压治疗的成本最小化分析。
Clin Ther. 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):88-102; discussion 87.
10
[Use of antihypertensive drugs in Spain, 1985-1995].[1985 - 1995年西班牙抗高血压药物的使用情况]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Feb 28;110(7):247-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic factors in the initiation of antihypertensive therapy.启动抗高血压治疗的经济因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Oct;2(4):324-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202040-00007.
2
Reserpine: a relic from the past or a neglected drug of the present for achieving cost containment in treating hypertension?利血平:是过去的遗留物还是当下为控制高血压治疗成本而被忽视的药物?
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(6):561-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02598229.