Ki Seunghee, Lee Dongeon, Lee Wonjin, Cho Kwangrae, Han Yongjae, Lee Jeonghan
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2022 Jan;17(1):44-51. doi: 10.17085/apm.21065. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Differences in the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on electroencephalogram patterns have been reported previously. However, the reliability of the Bispectral Index (BIS) value for assessing the sedation caused by dexmedetomidine remains debatable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the BIS value and the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine.
Forty-two patients (age range, 20-80 years) who were scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this study. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 0.5% bupivacaine, which was followed by dexmedetomidine infusion (loading dose, 0.5-1 μg/kg for 10 min; maintenance dose, 0.3-0.6 μg/kg/h). The MOAA/S score was used to evaluate the level of sedation, and the Vital Recorder program was used to collect data (vital signs and BIS values).
A total of 215082 MOAA/S scores and BIS data pairs were analyzed. The baseline variability of the BIS value was 7.024%, and the decrease in the BIS value was associated with a decrease in the MOAA/S score. The correlation coefficient and prediction probability between the two measurements were 0.566 (P < 0.0001) and 0.636, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation values of the BIS were 87.22 ± 7.06, 75.85 ± 9.81, and 68.29 ± 12.65 when the MOAA/S scores were 5, 3, and 1, respectively. Furthermore, the cut-off BIS values in the receiver operating characteristic analysis at MOAA/S scores of 5, 3, and 1 were 82, 79, and 73, respectively.
The BIS values were significantly correlated with the MOAA/S scores. Thus, the BIS along with the clinical sedation scale might prove useful in assessing the hypnotic depth of a patient during sedation with dexmedetomidine.
先前已有报道称丙泊酚和右美托咪定镇静对脑电图模式的影响存在差异。然而,双谱指数(BIS)值用于评估右美托咪定所致镇静的可靠性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估右美托咪定镇静患者的BIS值与改良的观察者警觉/镇静评估(MOAA/S)量表之间的相关性。
本研究纳入了42例计划在脊髓麻醉下接受择期手术的患者(年龄范围20 - 80岁)。使用0.5%布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉,随后输注右美托咪定(负荷剂量,0.5 - 1μg/kg,持续10分钟;维持剂量,0.3 - 0.6μg/kg/h)。采用MOAA/S评分评估镇静水平,并使用生命记录程序收集数据(生命体征和BIS值)。
共分析了215082对MOAA/S评分和BIS数据。BIS值的基线变异性为7.024%,BIS值的降低与MOAA/S评分的降低相关。两项测量之间的相关系数和预测概率分别为0.566(P < 0.0001)和0.636。当MOAA/S评分为5、3和1时,BIS的平均值±标准差分别为87.22 ± 7.06、75.85 ± 9.81和68.29 ± 12.65。此外,在MOAA/S评分为5、3和1时的受试者工作特征分析中,BIS的截断值分别为82、79和73。
BIS值与MOAA/S评分显著相关。因此,BIS与临床镇静量表一起可能有助于评估右美托咪定镇静期间患者的催眠深度。