Zheng Junbo, Gao Yang, Xu Xiaoyu, Kang Kai, Liu Haitao, Wang Hongliang, Yu Kaijiang
Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hegang People's Hospital, Hegang 154100, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):190-195. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.129.
This study aims to verify the correlation of bispectral index (BIS) and Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for evaluating these and explore possibility of replacing RASS with BIS.
This retrospective cohort study consisted of 74 patients who were collected from the third Intensive Care Unit (ICU) ward of XXX Hospital between May 2012 and June 2015 in this retrospective study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the 10-grade RASS and were continuously monitored with a BIS monitor during the procedure every 5 minutes. BIS values and RASS scores were recorded.
Patients were divided into dexmedetomidine (n=31) and midazolam (n=43) groups, and 342 paired data were collected. A statistically significant correlation existed between BIS values and RASS scores either in all patients undergoing flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) or in dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups at different time points. Correlation coefficient was higher in midazolam group compared with dexmedetomidine group at different time points (P<0.05).
A correlation was observed between BIS and RASS for evaluating depth of sedation in ICU patients undergoing FFB (P<0.05). Study results indicated that BIS monitoring is a meaningful tool, which can be applied as an adjunctive and alternative method to assess sedation, especially for high-risk patients who are prone to be under- or over-sedation.
本研究旨在验证脑电双频指数(BIS)与里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)在评估镇静深度方面的相关性,并探讨用BIS替代RASS的可能性。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了2012年5月至2015年6月期间在XXX医院第三重症监护病房(ICU)收集的74例患者。使用10级RASS评估镇静水平,并在操作过程中每隔5分钟用BIS监测仪进行连续监测。记录BIS值和RASS评分。
患者分为右美托咪定组(n = 31)和咪达唑仑组(n = 43),共收集到342对数据。在所有接受可弯曲纤维支气管镜检查(FFB)的患者中,以及在右美托咪定组和咪达唑仑组的不同时间点,BIS值与RASS评分之间均存在统计学显著相关性。在不同时间点,咪达唑仑组的相关系数高于右美托咪定组(P < 0.05)。
观察到BIS与RASS在评估接受FFB的ICU患者镇静深度方面存在相关性(P < 0.05)。研究结果表明,BIS监测是一种有意义的工具,可作为评估镇静的辅助和替代方法,尤其适用于容易出现镇静不足或过度镇静的高危患者。