Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
School of Nurinsg, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
J Vasc Access. 2023 Sep;24(5):1051-1060. doi: 10.1177/11297298211046755. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
This study was aimed to investigate the accuracy of anteroposterior chest radiography for tip position verification for the umbilical venous catheters in neonates compared to ultrasound. A search in the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO was conducted to evaluate all the related articles on umbilical venous catheter (UVC), ultrasound AND neonates updated to August, 2020. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Random effects model was used to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was constructed, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Fourteen related studies were finally included for meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of X-ray on tip verification of UVC were 0.90 (95% CI 0.71-0.97) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.53-0.95), respectively. The pooled DOR was 3.69 (95% CI 1.64-5.71). The AUC was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95). The meta-regression analysis suggested that study sample size, study design, different US confirming method, and different gold standard in original design might be potential sources of heterogeneity. Our conclusion is that the commonly used anteroposterior X-ray is not reliable in identifying the exact anatomical location of UVC tip in neonates. Studies suggested ultrasound or echocardiography with saline contrast injection could be the gold standard for verification of catheter location and should be considered whenever possible, especially in premature patients. More studies are needed to expand the use of ultrasound or echocardiography in tip position confirming of UVCs.
本研究旨在探讨与超声相比,前后位胸部 X 线摄影在新生儿脐静脉导管尖端位置验证中的准确性。在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 EBSCO 中进行了检索,以评估截至 2020 年 8 月所有关于脐静脉导管 (UVC)、超声和新生儿的相关文章。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估由两名研究员独立进行。使用随机效应模型估计汇总敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比 (DOR)。构建汇总受试者工作特征 (SROC) 曲线,并计算 SROC 曲线下面积 (AUC)。最终纳入 14 项相关研究进行荟萃分析。X 射线对 UVC 尖端验证的总体诊断敏感性和特异性分别为 0.90 (95% CI 0.71-0.97) 和 0.82 (95% CI 0.53-0.95)。汇总 DOR 为 3.69 (95% CI 1.64-5.71)。AUC 为 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95)。荟萃回归分析表明,研究样本量、研究设计、不同的 US 确认方法以及原始设计中的不同金标准可能是异质性的潜在来源。我们的结论是,常用的前后位 X 射线在识别新生儿 UVC 尖端的确切解剖位置方面不可靠。有研究表明,超声或超声心动图联合盐水对比注射可能是导管位置验证的金标准,应尽可能考虑使用,特别是在早产儿中。需要更多的研究来扩大超声或超声心动图在 UVC 尖端位置确认中的应用。